This category is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Oops, I just checked that it produced a bluelink. But there should be a category Fictional people, shouldn't there? In order to subcategorize them by typically human characteristics. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Marcocapelle: I had assumed that the recent surge in fictional Fooian people... categories was because the author had mechanically copied the structure of the non-fictional people tree (75 such creations between 12 and 18 September, plus a few that were deleted), and that older stable categories tend to use characters, as for the root category. If you ask me, Fictional characters looks slightly better in the sense that characters are not made of flesh and bone, unlike people. Harry Potter is a character, not a person. However, the focus of this speedy nomination was more on replacing ethnic group by ethnicity, which I think is supported by C2C. So I'm withdrawing this one, and adding a new nomination at top of the page. Place Clichy (talk) 08:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
