Category talk:Freemasons of the United Grand Lodge of England

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Huon in topic Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

edit

Many of the people currently in this category are included based on dubious criteria and unreliable sources, often masonic websites with no indication of editorial oversight. For example:

For very few of them is freemasonry a significant aspect, no more so than, say, religious affiliation or a membership in a sports club would be. We wouldn't categorize people by soccer club unless they're active players or club functionaries. Similarly, categorizing random people who happen to have been freemasons not just as freemasons but - often without evidence or with original synthesis - as members of a specific Grand Lodge doesn't seem appropriate to me. Only those whom reliable third-party sources connect to the United Grand Lodge of England should be categorized here. Huon (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply