This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
Oppose short nameCategory:Iowa Stars as ambiguous; categories should be unambiguous even where there is an article at the "main topic", because articles can have a disambiguation hatnote. IMHO the acceptable category names are the later name Category:Iowa Chops or the unambiguous Category:Iowa Stars (AHL). Note that the page was recently moved from Iowa Chops to Iowa Stars because the team had that name for longer. I would therefore be inclined to support the original nomination if it were at a full CfD. How about a WP:BOLD move of the page Iowa Stars to Iowa Stars (AHL)? if there is no objection to that, then this can come back again as a valid C2D. As for the sub-cat, note that there are two: Category:Iowa Stars (AHL) players and Category:Iowa Chops players, presumably covering different periods; I do not know whether the usual practice would be to merge them. – FayenaticLondon21:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'd oppose a move of the article without an RM. There's no need to impose CfD requirements in mainspace. Looks like inertia is going to win out here. --BDD (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
