You don't have citation of them proving themselves as atheists and not irreligious

edit

Lovers of atheism make atheism show wider but without actual atheists

edit

most of these people were irreligious and some non-theists

edit

Irreligion and generic Nontheism are different metaphysical opinions and notions and must be presented on different pages.


Distorting notions via mergers is a mere gerrymanderism


  • if so many things are distorted as atheism by you, then atheism:
  1. isn't a definite but a generic term to you
  2. you swap the meaning of atheism vs irreligion (or other nontheistic terms)
  3. you don't follow the nomenclature most humans use

irreligious (very soft) < atheist (narrower, more specific) < non-spiritualist (even narrower, not only against god/kami) < scientifist (even against USOs because they aren't accepted in a provable way by more than three major universities [no major university accepts conspiracy theories])

edit

Some Japanese are scientifists.

(not Scientologists, who perform the supposed by them Science of scatology) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8457:2F00:48F:780F:C9B1:83C7 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply