Category talk:KSI
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Fayenatic london in topic Opposed speedy move request
Opposed speedy move request
edit Moved from WP:CFDS
- Category:Songs written by KSI (entertainer) to Category:Songs written by KSI – C2D Richhoncho (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Category:KSI (entertainer) songs to Category:KSI songs
- Category:KSI (entertainer) albums to Category:KSI albums
- Category:KSI (entertainer) to Category:KSI
- Oppose, Richhoncho KSI is ambiguous, see KSI (disambiguation), so C2D does not apply. TSventon (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- TSventon. Categories are named after articles, there was an unanimous RM decision to move the article which my nomination follows. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Richhoncho, C2D "generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator". The closing admin can decide if C2D applies in this case. It is helpful to mention that the article was renamed by RM as that confirms the move was not controversial. TSventon (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- A full discussion is required.– Fayenatic London 16:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Fayenatic london: This discussion never took place as the original nominator of the speedy request took it upon himself to manually move all the content to the proposed names. Should these be reverted? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes. Looks good for now. There is no other meaning of KSI that has a category, so a full discussion might well approve renaming to the short name; but it is required. – Fayenatic London 07:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Fayenatic london: This discussion never took place as the original nominator of the speedy request took it upon himself to manually move all the content to the proposed names. Should these be reverted? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- A full discussion is required.– Fayenatic London 16:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Richhoncho, C2D "generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator". The closing admin can decide if C2D applies in this case. It is helpful to mention that the article was renamed by RM as that confirms the move was not controversial. TSventon (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- TSventon. Categories are named after articles, there was an unanimous RM decision to move the article which my nomination follows. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)