 | This category was nominated for renaming on 21 September 2013. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Opening heading
editSuggestion: Tie this to human resources management somehow. (I'm still not fluent in Wikipedia terminology so I may be talking about merging or something else.) In the US especially, the term human resources is much more widespread in popular society. Sonria 19:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Human resources" is "much more widespread", if at all, only among certain management groups. It is not by any means more widespread than "labor" among legal professions, workers, or many other categories. Please see, for example, Labor law. --Lquilter (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
cleaning up
editThis category is huge! And very redundant of Category:Labour relations. I've been making some basic subcategories to try to diffuse it a little, and to get the articles here into other relevant category trees as well. --Lquilter (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
category section
editI remove labor capitalism and marxian economic cats. Because the labor isn't a business and because labor is not necessarily linked to capitalism and to marxian economics. If you want, you can give your opinion. Zipodu (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Main article
editIf the main article for this category is Wage labour, should the category be renamed to match that main article? AusLondonder (talk) 06:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)