Category talk:Men centenarians

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Michael Bednarek in topic Non-diffusing

About the necessity of this category

edit

First of all, let me say that I am not advocating the abolition of this category, I am simply questioning it.
Is there a need to categorize centenarians by gender? Moreover, isn't this category only for people from the US, Australia, and other Western countries, and excludes most people from Asia, Africa, and other regions? (It's an incomplete category) Shouldn't this be improved?

In addition, as an aside, considering that gender identity will become more diverse in the future, isn't it going to become tougher to separate men from women? — Preceding unsigned comment added by カッパ鳥 (talkcontribs) 21:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Non-diffusing

edit

It seems the instruction for non-diffusing categories are widely misunderstood. It says, "It includes Centenarians that can also be found in the parent category, or in diffusing subcategories of the parent." (my bolding). IOW, American men centenarians should not be in this category. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply