Category talk:NA-Class articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Mercurywoodrose in topic Confusing
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NA-Class articles category. |
|
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Remae Class
editI think that this should be renamed to Misc-Class articles, or something along those lines. I know that NA is an acronym for Not Applicable and is usually written as N/A. I was wondering what other peoples opinions on this matter may be. Or am I in the wrong place?--Pokémaniac Thomas (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree: until I read your comment, I had no idea what NA meant in this context. Misc would be better. --Jubilee♫clipman 07:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Confusing
editI know this wont be read by many, but i dont like how NA-Class is confused with NA-importance. since all the various nonarticle pages have appropriate classes, like category, template, etc. I dont see the value in this class.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)