Category talk:Nymphs

Untitled

"Articles on specific nymphs should be added only to this category, whereas articles on nymphs in general should be added both to this category and to the Greek mythology article."

I'd disagree with that; as this category is already a subcategory of Greek mythology, this just creates redundancy. Plus, what do we do with articles where the name applies to both an individual nymph and a classification? -Sean Curtin 01:32, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Heh. I'd just remembered to come by and fix that myself. When I first wrote it, categories were brand spanking new and the guidelines for dealing with such redundancies were in flux; I left that note simply to describe how I'd been handling the situation myself at that point so that there'd be consistency. I've since fallen firmly in line with the official avoid-redundancy camp. :) Bryan 20:49, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'll also add Category:Roman mythology to the page. -Sean Curtin 00:53, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)