Category talk:Origin hypotheses of ethnic groups

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Philosophy

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Category:Pseudoarchaeology

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Clearly, only some of the articles and categories in this category belong in Category:Pseudoarchaeology, so the cat should be removed.

Category:Groups claiming Israelite descent‎ is the only obvious one I - as a non-expert - can see. Are there enough other examples to justify something like a Category:Pseudoscientific origin hypotheses of ethnic groups, or should we just put that one in Category:Pseudoarchaeology? --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic