Category talk:Polish sex offenders

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 81.151.4.133 in topic Do we really need this page?

Do we really need this page?

edit

As the talk title says, what exactly is the purpose of this 'category', other than arbitrarily list 'three' people? This appears more like some 'pet project' to justify this page, since I'm sure there are plenty other Polish 'sex offenders'. Prove me wrong, or make the effort to list EVERY [proven] sex offender, be it on charges of unlawful sex with a minor or violent rape, that were ever known in Poland, famous or otherwise. Unless this page is populated by ALL those who were EVER convicted of a sex crime, famous or otherwise, this page is utterly 'pointless'. 109.153.105.18 (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This cat should only hold people of Polish birth - which Polanski e.g. is NOT - & who are PRESENTLY registered as sex offenders IN Poland. Besides, '3 people' does NOT warrant an entire cat, of which one has no entry about any sex offence conviction at all, & Polanski does NOT belong there since he's French. 109.153.105.18 (talk) 00:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • That's not how categories work. They are for anyone, past or present, who is notable for meeting the definitional requirements of the category. It is not limited to Polish persons currently "registered" as sex offenders. Not every Polish sex offender is included, however, because it is only for people who are notable as such. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
That's exactly the point - Polanski is NOT Polish he is French & doesn't belong there.109.153.105.18 (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Who said that I said you said anything about Polanski? I said HE IS NOT POLISH, hence he doesn’t belong here. 109.153.103.76 (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
By not addressing my point, you keep the public in ill-information with this entry. I thought Wikipedia is supposed to be FACTUAL. IT IS NOT in this case. (Shared IP.) 81.151.4.133 (talk) 00:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply