Category talk:Pop punk groups

Discussion: Wikipedia List Precedence

this was posted on talk:List of pop punk bands but i wanted to repost it here so that we can some consensus. In a nutshell im advocating for the development of both lists and categories. Xsxex 20:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

"Dear fellow wikipedians & fellow WikiProject Punk music participants. This is a space to discuss the uses of list (and categories) as Wikipedia has developed. We can use Wikipedia:List guideline and Wikipedia:Categories vs lists as reference points. Since the discussion has been initiated to turn this page into a category page, I am proposing that we wait a week (8/9/06?) to sort out some new developments. The Pop punk article will be merged with Pop punk (revival) as decided in a discussion amongst 15 users Talk:Pop punk (revival), go check it out and add your comments too. If we can have a good talk about the utility of list and categories and come to some mutual understandings i think we'll be able to all get our points across. Instead of thinking category OR list we can have both, however it is true that we need to have a better understanding of the function of the list, and maintain it better. That said, lets use the space below to talk about Wikipedias list guidelines. We can also nuture the related categories such as Pop punk groups and Pop punk albums. Thanx!!!! Xsxex 17:57, 31 July 2006" (UTC)

this list is screwed up

whoever made this list couldn't have done a worse job. the majority of the bands on this list are pop punk, and i can see why you would see bands like MCR as pop punk even though they aren't pop punk, but atreyu and eighteen visions!? no way!

I agree. Plus where is The Offspring. There's a reason Smash is always included with Dookie as being apart of the new punk revival.

Yeah and bad religion are not pop punk. They are a punk rock band formed in 1980.