Category talk:Ports and harbours of Northern Cyprus
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dr.K. in topic Untitled
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
edit@Alexyflemming: "This category is being considered for speedy renaming to Category:Ports and harbours of Northern Cyprus"
@The Banner: I find it difficult to understand this systematic deletion or renaming of all of my articles without even notifying me by certain editors. Can you please examine the validity of it? Thank you. --Hadgimarvi (talk) 08:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Untitled
edit- @Hadgimarvi: I find it difficult to discuss valid actions with somebody accused of sockpuppetry and POV-pushing. The Banner talk 09:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- This cat isn't being deleted; it's being renamed to uncapitalise 'Harbours'. 31.153.72.171 (talk) 10:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your response. It was very helpful indeed; now I at least know that there is not much difference between being accused and found guilty. By the way, my intention of 'inviting' you here was purely to draw the attention of an expert to something that I thought was not right. I am well aware that discussing such issues with an expert is much beyond the knowledge and capacity of a newcomer. Thanks again.--Hadgimarvi (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- You created duplicate articles that were merged. I don't think you need to be explained why we don't need duplicates. As for this, it's just a rename to bring it in line with the MOS. Having said that, I'm not in agreement with The Banner's response. 31.153.72.171 (talk) 15:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Checkuser has determined that this user has indeed engaged in sockpuppetry and got blocked for a week. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hadgimarvi. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, in that case, I stand corrected. 213.7.147.34 (talk) 01:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- The world of socks is murky, but as a rule of thumb, the bigger the mess the greater the probability for a sock to be around. And this mess was rather big. :) Thankfully, thanks in no small part to your alert, it was resolved. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well, in that case, I stand corrected. 213.7.147.34 (talk) 01:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Checkuser has determined that this user has indeed engaged in sockpuppetry and got blocked for a week. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hadgimarvi. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- You created duplicate articles that were merged. I don't think you need to be explained why we don't need duplicates. As for this, it's just a rename to bring it in line with the MOS. Having said that, I'm not in agreement with The Banner's response. 31.153.72.171 (talk) 15:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for putting the errors in order.--Hadgimarvi (talk) 02:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your response. It was very helpful indeed; now I at least know that there is not much difference between being accused and found guilty. By the way, my intention of 'inviting' you here was purely to draw the attention of an expert to something that I thought was not right. I am well aware that discussing such issues with an expert is much beyond the knowledge and capacity of a newcomer. Thanks again.--Hadgimarvi (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)