Category talk:Saints articles needing attention

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Carminowe of Hendra in topic Padarn and Paternus

In what sense?

edit

Obviously all articles need attention. But what are the criteria for including them in this (very short) shortlist? —Ian Spackman 20:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't know how or where to put this request for someone familiar with hagiography or history to review my proposed new article on Harriet Monsell, who is remembered on Aanglican calendars circa 26 March. I'm new enough to make mistakes both socially and with formatting. My only other article, about Elizabeth Ferard, got waylaid for quite a while in part because of a stupid formatting problem (carriage return in first line), that I don't want to happen again. It was tough enough uploading the picture of her from an out-of-copyrigt book. 05:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jweaver28 (talkcontribs)

Dag Hammarskjöld?

edit

I am wondering why this man is included in this list of articles needing attention. Why is he even listed as a saint? I think this is stretching it a little. No, more than a little. Do we have any common guideline to work with that determines what can be legitamately thought of as sainthood? Moonbug 19:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Padarn and Paternus

edit

I have tagged Padarn and Paternus as needing attention - both seem to refer to their subject being the founder of St Padarn's Church, Llanbadarn Fawr, though that article only links to Padarn. Paternus mentions several saints of that name in a hatnote, but does not link to Padarn, or vice versa. It would appear that there is some overlap: the French-language equivalent fr:Saint Paterne is a disambiguation page, listing 7 (arguably 8) saints of that name, though only two of those have articles. cy:Padarn, on the other hand, has no inter-language links. Hopefully someone who knows the Padarns/Paternuses better than I do will be able to help these two articles. Thanks, Carminowe of Hendra (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply