Species described in the 20th century is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
This category is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the category attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Does it make any sense to have this page? Perhaps we could only mention classic examples of classified species. Simply listing the hundreds of thoursands of species that were classified in the past century does not make sense. What is the criteria for inclusion of a species in this list?
I know that people who edit this site are pretty big into science, but the average wikipedia user does not speak fluent latin and would therefore have no clue what any of this means. Why don't we stick to conventional names for animals as opposed to their scientific names; there is a reason why we see scientific names in parentheses beneath the common name in literally ever source ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.155.240 (talk) 04:43, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
