This category is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Re Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_19#Squamish, for the second time I'm being made the issue despite the presence of support for my proposal, including Themightyquill's speaking up for me and even Uysvdi being open to Category:Skwxwu7mesh. Instead of discussing the issues, I feel I was WP:BAITed by all this criticism of my writing - my attempts to refute the false logics and misquoted guidelines by people who know nothing about the place this title is about or the people the category is about. This isn't over. I don't see consensus, not a valid one. Bad ideas should not be given equal weight to correct ones. Shooting the messenger is an old game in Wikipedia, and it's why content suffers but t he name-games go on and on and on.....Skookum1 (talk) 02:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
