Category talk:Top-importance Cats articles
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The purpose of this page is to discuss those articles which we individually believe are of the greatest importance to the project. We will then discuss the nominations, and ultimately collaboratively decide which are to be included in this category. I like the way that some of the other projects are doing this, by having nominations listed followed by people who support or oppose a given article's importance in a given category. On that basis, I am starting the nominations below. Feel free to add any that you wish, and to support or oppose any already listed.
A vital topic for the subject. Badbilltucker 23:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Clearly, one of the most important articles to the project. Badbilltucker 23:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The generic page for all the big cats, also very important. Badbilltucker 23:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
One of the most widely recognized, and most frequently visited, pages we have. Badbilltucker 23:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Because cats are one of the most common pets and most people know of cats because they make such great pets.Kpstewart (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Lots of people still don't understand this aspect of cats, me included. Badbilltucker 23:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. The article is very short uses a lot of technical language explaining the mechanics of purring that a lot of readers may not care for. According to the guidelines in the [assessment] page, I believe that the purr article fits none of the top criteria, and believe that the article belongs in the "mid" label. As a compromise, I've reassessed the article to "high", but others are free to weigh in on the topic.Kpstewart (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
(Oh my. No, I'm not adding Bears too.) Also one of the most frequently visited. Badbilltucker 23:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)