This category is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Templates, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Wikipedia's templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject TemplatesTemplates articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
I created {{By-elections to the 37th UK Parliament}} a few days ago, but I held off adding it to articles, as it looks very long. I've been considering splitting it in two (36-39; 40-45) or even three (36-38; 39-41; 42-45) - purely to reduce its length. As you created many of the other templates in the series, I'd be interested to hear whether you think this is a good idea. Warofdreamstalk03:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Good point! It is pretty huge :(
When I first looked at it, I thought that splitting it was appropriate, but then when I thought about how to split it, I reckoned that the navigation between the fragments would end up producing rather clumsy headers. So I wondered about making the box collapsible.
That turned out to be a rather complicated exercise, but after playing with several of the templates listed at Template:Navigation/doc, I found a way of using Template:Navbox generic to create a template which is collapsed when loaded.
That reduces the visual bulk of template, because it occupies only one line when loaded. It does have a much heavier impact on the download weight of the page: up from 30KB without the template to 80KB with it. I'm not sure how much attention to pay to that: I the 1990s, I used to work hard to keep webpages as lightweight as possible, but bandwidth is much less of an issue these days, and an extra 50KB doesn't seem to me to be too heavy a payload (it's the equivalent of having a few images attached).
Yes, I like that. I'd be happy to move the sandbox version here, and then implement the same style for the other templates in the series. Warofdreamstalk12:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply