This category is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Additional information:
/
No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This category was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.
I created the category after finding six different articles, nearly all of which had a paragraph toward the end referencing each other. Not finding an extant appropriate category, I created this one.
Category:Genocides is a related category to this, but should not be a subcategory. Genocides that were also war crimes should simply have both category labels. Christopher Parham(talk) 04:47, 2005 August 8 (UTC)
Latest comment: 17 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion
Given the grief that's currently going on at Haditha killings and 2006 Qana airstrike over whether those pages qualify for this category, is anyone interested in writing some clear guidelines on the main page for what incidents qualify for this category? I don't have a particularly strong opinion over what those guidelines should be, as long as they're specific enough to resolve some of the page scuffles. As a starting proposal, I suggest:
This page categorizes subjects relating to war crimes. For specific events that have either been (1) legally ruled to be war crimes or (2) credibly alleged to be war crimes, see category:Legally established war crimes and category:Alleged war crimes respectively.
Probably just because nobody noticed it. category:Terrorism has the same problem. On any given day, you have about a 60% chance of finding either Hamas or the Jewish Defense League, but probably not both. TheronJ21:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well people are alleging it would seem to be enough, people in a position to judge what constitutes a 'war crime' I mean. Is Israel signed up to the International Criminal Court? Nope. [1] Would the UN be able to prosecute when you need unanimous on the Security Council? Nope. [2] 'Accusations of warcrimes' or something like 'Untried allegations of..' or 'Unproven war crimes allegations'? That gets you around the case of their status as never going to court, and allows retrospective things like Guernica & Dresden bombing etc to fit in there- widely accepted as war crimes but only rhetorically declared so. 82.29.227.17122:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
This issue just came up with an attempt to include the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in this category. I'm inclined to agree with the separation between alleged and established war crimes based on formal international findings. Below is my post on the topic from talk:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Rem0104:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
An attempt was made to assert (via the categories) that the atomic bombings were a war crime. This is a controversial, political opinion that is by no means commonly accepted or encyclopedic. Its inclusion in the "war crimes" category devalues that category; if anyone can classify an act as a war crime without use of some sort of objective criteria, the category will be reduced to a tool for political commentary. My off-the-cuff criteria for distinguishing a war crime would be some sort of formal international approbation, including UN Security Council resolutions to that effect, or findings of guilt in an international war crimes tribunal. Cross-posting to "war crimes" category talk page.