Category talk:Women composers
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Schissel in topic Women composers / Women classical composers
 | This category was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Category title
editWould Female composers be more accurate? scarecroe 01:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
debate
editAn unsourced claim of former debate is irrelevant. Septentrionalis 21:36, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Cfd 22 Aug 2005
editNo consensus, no change, see discussion for details. However, previous Cfd was to delete, you can see the entire 15 June Cfd discussion here, and following conversations covering gender related categories. ∞Who?¿? 01:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you; this reference should have been supplied to the deletion discussion. I will comment here that Niteowlneil's argument seems to ignore the fundamental category structure; there shouldn't be any individual bio's in Category:Composers or Category:scientists; all should be subcatted by period, style/science, and (why not?) gender. Septentrionalis 17:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
CFD
edit| | This category was nominated for deletion on 18 July 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| | This category was nominated for deletion on 4 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
hurp durp woman composer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.195.171 (talk) 14:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Women composers / Women classical composers
editWhat is the distinction between the two categories? Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)