The Chamic languages, also known as Aceh–Chamic and Acehnese–Chamic, are a group of ten languages spoken in Aceh (Sumatra, Indonesia) and in parts of Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam and Hainan, China. The Chamic languages are a subgroup of Malayo-Polynesian languages in the Austronesian family. The ancestor of this subfamily, proto-Chamic, is associated with the Sa Huỳnh culture, its speakers arriving in what is now Vietnam from Formosa.[1]
| Chamic | |
|---|---|
| Aceh–Chamic | |
| Geographic distribution | Indonesia (Aceh), Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, China (Hainan Island), various countries with recent immigrants |
| Linguistic classification | Austronesian
|
| Proto-language | Proto-Chamic |
| Subdivisions | |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-2 / 5 | cmc |
| Glottolog | cham1327 (Aceh–Chamic)cham1330 (Chamic) |
 | |
After Acehnese, with 3.5 million, Jarai and Cham are the most widely spoken Chamic languages, with about 230,000 and 280,000 speakers respectively, in both Cambodia and Vietnam. Tsat is the most northern and least spoken, with only 3000 speakers.
History
editCham has the oldest literary history of any Austronesian language. The Dong Yen Chau inscription, written in Old Cham, dates from the late 4th century AD.
Extensive borrowing resulting from long-term contact have caused Chamic and the Bahnaric languages, a branch of the Austroasiatic family, to have many vocabulary items in common.[1][2]
Classification
editGraham Thurgood gives the following classification for the Chamic languages.[3] Individual languages are marked by italics.
- Chamic
- Acehnese
- Coastal Chamic
- Haroi
- Cham language (Vietnamese: Chăm)
- Western Cham
- Eastern Cham (Panduranga Cham)
- Highlands Chamic
- Rade–Jarai
- Rade (Vietnamese: Ê-đê)
- Jarai (Vietnamese: Gia Rai)
- Chru–Northern
- Chru (Vietnamese: Chu Ru)
- Northern Cham
- Roglai (Vietnamese: Ra Glai)
- Tsat
- Rade–Jarai
The Proto-Chamic numerals from 7 to 9 are shared with those of the Malayic languages, providing partial evidence for a Malayo-Chamic subgrouping.[4]
Roger Blench[5] also proposes that there may have been at least one other Austroasiatic branch in coastal Vietnam that is now extinct, based on various Austroasiatic loanwords in modern-day Chamic languages that cannot be clearly traced to existing Austroasiatic branches.[5][6]
Reconstruction
edit| Proto-Chamic | |
|---|---|
| Reconstruction of | Chamic languages |
Reconstructed ancestors | |
The Proto-Chamic reconstructed below is from Graham Thurgood's 1999 publication From Ancient Cham to Modern Dialects.[1]
Consonants
editThe following table of Proto-Chamic presyllabic consonants are from Thurgood.[7] There are a total of 13–14 presyllabic consonants depending on whether or not *ɲ is counted. Non-presyllabic consonants include *ʔ, *ɓ, *ɗ, *ŋ, *y, *w. Aspirated consonants are also reconstructable for Proto-Chamic.
| Bilabial | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plosive | Voiceless | p | t | c | k | |
| Voiced | b | d | ɟ | ɡ | ||
| Nasal | m | ɲ[8] | ||||
| Lateral | l | |||||
| Tap or trill | r | |||||
| Fricative | s | h | ||||
The following consonant clusters are reconstructed for Proto-Chamic:[9] *pl-, *bl-, *kl-, *gl-, *pr-, *tr-, *kr-, *br-, *dr-. Initial *n did not exist, it was replaced by *l instead (*nanaq → *lanah "pus").[10]
Vowels
editThere are four vowels (*-a, *-i, *-u, and *-e, or alternatively *-ə) and three diphthongs (*-ay, *-uy, *-aw).[1]
| Height | Front | Central | Back | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close | i /i/ | u /u/ | |||||
| Mid | e /e/ | ([ə /ə/]) | |||||
| Open | a /a/ |
Morphology
editReconstructed Proto-Chamic morphological components are:[1]
- *tə-: the "inadvertent" prefix
- *mə-: common verb prefix
- *pə-: causative prefix
- *bɛʔ-: negative imperative prefix (borrowed from Austroasiatic languages)
- *-əm-: nominalizing infix
- *-ən-: instrumental infix (borrowed from Austroasiatic languages)
Pronouns
editProto-Chamic has the following personal pronouns:[11]
Singular
- *kəu – 'I' (familiar)
- *hulun – 'I' (polite); 'slave'
- *dahlaʔ – 'I' (polite)
- *hã – 'you; thou'
- *ñu – 'he, she; they'
Plural
- *kaməi – 'we' (exclusive)
- *ta – 'we' (inclusive)
- *drəi – 'we' (inclusive); reflexive
- *gəp – other; group (borrowed from Austroasiatic languages)
Proto-Chamic and Chamic lexical correspondences
editProto-Chamic, Mainland Chamic, Acehnese and Malay comparative table:
| Gloss | Proto-Chamic | Western Cham | Eastern Cham | Roglai | Aceh | Malay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| one | *sa | /sa ha/ | /tha/ | /sa/ | /sa/ | satu |
| seven | *tujuh | /taçuh/ | /taçŭh/ | /tijuh/ | /tujoh/ | tujuh |
| fire | *ʔapuy | /pui/ | /apuy/ | /apui/ | /apui/ | api |
| sky | *laŋit | /laŋiʔ/ | /laŋiʔ/ Lingik | /laŋĩːʔ/ | /laŋɛt/ | langit |
| rice (husked) | *braːs | /prah/ | /prah-l/ | /bra/ | /brɯəh/ | beras |
| iron | *bisεy | /pasay/ | /pithăy/ | /pisǝy/ | /bɯsɔə/ | besi |
| sugarcane | *tabɔw-v | /tapau/ | /tapăw/ | /tubəu/ | /tɯbɛə/ | tebu |
Notes
edit- ^ a b c d e f Thurgood 1999.
- ^ Sidwell 2009.
- ^ Thurgood 1999, p. 36.
- ^ Thurgood 1999, p. 37.
- ^ a b Blench, Roger (2009). "Are There Four Additional Unrecognised Branches of Austroasiatic?".
- ^ Sidwell, Paul (2006). "Dating the Separation of Acehnese and Chamic By Etymological Analysis of the Aceh-Chamic Lexicon" (PDF). Mon-Khmer Studies. 36: 187–206. doi:10.15144/MKSJ-36.187. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-11-08.
- ^ Thurgood 1999, p. 68.
- ^ Reflexes of ɲ are rare in modern Chamic languages.
- ^ Thurgood 1999, p. 93.
- ^ Thurgood 1999, p. 69.
- ^ Thurgood 1999, pp. 247–248.
References
edit- Sidwell, Paul (2009). Classifying the Austroasiatic Languages: History and State of the Art. LINCOM Europa. Archived from the original on 2019-03-24. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
- Thurgood, Graham (1999). From Ancient Cham to Modern Dialects: Two Thousand Years of Language Contact and Change: With an Appendix of Chamic Reconstructions and Loanwords. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications. University of Hawai'i Press. pp. i, iii–vii, ix–xiii, xv–xvii, 1–259, 261–275, 277–397, 399–407. ISBN 0824821319. JSTOR 20006770.