City of Chicago v. Fulton, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the mere retention of estate property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not violate , which operates as a "stay" of "any act" to "exercise control" over the property of the estate.[1][2]
City of Chicago v. Fulton | |
---|---|
Decided January 14, 2021 | |
Full case name | City of Chicago v. Fulton |
Docket no. | 19-357 |
Citations | 592 U.S. ___ (more) |
Holding | |
The mere retention of estate property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not violate | , which operates as a "stay" of "any act" to "exercise control" over the property of the estate.|
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Alito, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Bankruptcy Code |
References
editExternal links
editThis article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)