The distribution was introduced by Shumeli et al. (2005),[1] and the name Conway–Maxwell–binomial distribution was introduced independently by Kadane (2016) [2] and Daly and Gaunt (2016).[3]
The following relationship between Conway–Maxwell–Poisson (CMP) and CMB random variables [1] generalises a well-known result concerning Poisson and binomial random variables. If and are independent, then .
Sum of possibly associated Bernoulli random variables
For general , there do not exist closed form expressions for the moments of the CMB distribution. The following neat formula is available, however.[3] Let denote the falling factorial. Let , where . Then
Fix and and let Then converges in distribution to the distribution as .[3] This result generalises the classical Poisson approximation of the binomial distribution.
for . This distribution generalises the Poisson binomial distribution in a way analogous to the CMP and CMB generalisations of the Poisson and binomial distributions. Such a random variable is therefore said [3] to follow the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson binomial (CMPB) distribution. This should not be confused with the rather unfortunate terminology Conway–Maxwell–Poisson–binomial that was used by [1] for the CMB distribution.
The case is the usual Poisson binomial distribution and the case is the distribution.
^ abcdeShmueli G., Minka T., Kadane J.B., Borle S., and Boatwright, P.B. "A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 54.1 (2005): 127–142.[1]
^ abcKadane, J.B. " Sums of Possibly Associated Bernoulli Variables: The Conway–Maxwell–Binomial Distribution." Bayesian Analysis 11 (2016): 403–420.
^ abcdefDaly, F. and Gaunt, R.E. " The Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution: distributional theory and approximation." ALEA Latin American Journal of Probabability and Mathematical Statistics 13 (2016): 635–658.