Denezpi v. United States, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them.[1][2]
Denezpi v. United States | |
---|---|
Decided June 13, 2022 | |
Full case name | Denezpi v. United States |
Docket no. | 20-7622 |
Citations | 596 U.S. ___ (more) |
Holding | |
The double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Barrett |
Dissent | Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor (in part), Kagan (in part) |
References
editExternal links
editThis article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)