Denezpi v. United States

Denezpi v. United States, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them.[1][2]

Denezpi v. United States
Decided June 13, 2022
Full case nameDenezpi v. United States
Docket no.20-7622
Citations596 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
The double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
MajorityBarrett
DissentGorsuch, joined by Sotomayor (in part), Kagan (in part)

References

edit
  1. ^ Denezpi v. United States, No. 20-7622, 596 U.S. ___ (2022).
  2. ^ "Focusing on the meaning of "offense," a divided court throws salt on double jeopardy claim". SCOTUSblog. 2022-06-14. Retrieved 2024-10-31.
edit
  • Text of Denezpi v. United States, No. 20-7622, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)