| Submission declined on 13 November 2024 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: This draft appears to be an autobiography, the submission of which is strongly discouraged. See the conflict of interest policy for more information.If this draft is resubmitted, it is recommended that it be nominated for deletion. If this draft is not an autobiography, it may be resubmitted with an explanation on the draft talk page that it is not an autobiography.This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NBIO is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion. You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.In particular, see and refer to WP:NBIO for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
 | This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. (November 2024) |
Advocate Kumar Manish is a well-known criminal lawyer who has been in the field of law since last 30 years. He is currently practicing in Dhanbad Civil Court and Ranchi High Court in the state of Jharkhand.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————References: -
[1]बचाव पक्ष के अधिवक्ता समर श्रीवास्तव, अंशु श्रीवास्तव , कुमार मनीष, रजनी मुखर्जी, सुब्रतो मुखर्जी,धर्मजीत पासवान के तीखे सवालों के बौछार ने पूरी कर दी।https://www.jagran.com/jharkhand/dhanbad-bihari-lal-murder-case-18141650.html
- ^ "बिहारीलाल हत्याकाड में बिंदू सिंह समेत सात रिहा -". Jagran (in Hindi). Retrieved 2024-11-13.