Submission declined on 2 October 2024 by Cabrils (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
- Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that the references are not formatted correctly (see Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor and Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help). Also please remove inline citations. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 09:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Anna Szyjkowska-Piotrowska is a Polish art theorist, cultural philosopher, and linguist, author of scientific publications and books on artistic and philosophical themes. She is a professor at the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw, where she works in the Department of Design Theory at the Faculty of Design. She also conducts research as a collaborator at Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne in the ACTE Institute (Aesthetics and Critical Theory of Culture) and as an assistant professor at the Fryderyk Chopin University of Music.
Anna Szyjkowska-Piotrowska | |
---|---|
Born | 1981 (age 42–43) |
Nationality | Polish |
Occupation(s) | Art theorist, cultural philosopher, linguist |
Employer(s) | Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw, Fryderyk Chopin University of Music |
Research Work
editIn her work, she addresses new challenges of ethics in design, the theme of identity, its transformations, and their visualization. She operates at the intersection of various disciplines, combining theory with artistic practice.
Publications
editSzyjkowska-Piotrowska is the author of several books and articles, including:
- Post-face. Transcending Visibility in Art and Philosophy [1]
- Conducting Waves: Thinking in Visual and Musical Avant-Gardes [2]
- Is Making Art a Way of Thinking? [3]
Additionally, she has authored several articles, including:
- Whereof We Cannot Speak, There Must We Paint. The Role of Language in Art. More details can be found on PhilPapers [4]
- Articulating an Inclusive Artistic Practice (2014): This article examines the dynamics of inclusivity in art practices. Available at Academia.edu [5]
- Transcending Visibility: Intermediality in Contemporary Art (2015): This paper discusses the role of intermediality in contemporary artistic expressions. Available at Academia.edu [6]
- The Role of Memory in Artistic Practice (2016): This article investigates the importance of memory in the creation and interpretation of art. Available at Academia.edu [7]
- Post-face: The Fluidity of Identity (2017): This work discusses the concept of "post-face" and its implications for understanding identity in art. Available at Academia.edu [8]
She has also participated in discussions on her work, such as:
Institutions
editSzyjkowska-Piotrowska serves as a member of the Artistic Chapter of the Cyprian Norwid Award, is a member of the interdisciplinary research center on modernism and avant-garde MODERNITAS, and a member of Maison des Sciences Humaines.
References
edit- ^ Szyjkowska, Anna; Szyjkowska-Piotrowska, Anna (2015). Po-twarz: przekraczanie widzialności w sztuce i filozofii (in Polish). Słowo/Obraz Terytoria. ISBN 978-83-7908-043-4.
- ^ Szyjkowska-Piotrowska, Anna (2019). Conducting Waves: Thinking in Visual and Musical Avant-Gardes. Słowo/Obraz Terytoria.
- ^ "Is Making Art a Way of Thinking?". Art Inquiry. Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "Whereof We Cannot Speak, There Must We Paint. The Role of Language in Art". PhilPapers. Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "Articulating an Inclusive Artistic Practice". Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "Transcending Visibility: Intermediality in Contemporary Art". Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "The Role of Memory in Artistic Practice". Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "Post-face: The Fluidity of Identity". Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "Lecture: Anna Szyjkowska-Piotrowska 'Anu Põder: Body-Object vs Body-Space'". YouTube. Retrieved 2024-09-24.
- ^ "Post-face. Transcending Visibility in Art and Philosophy". YouTube. Retrieved 2024-10-02.
- ^ "Podcast „Szturm sztuk", s. 3, odc. 2: Anna Szyjkowska-Piotrowska: Wychodząc z ram". Vogue. Retrieved 2024-09-24.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.