Draft:AnonVM
The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Bonadea 6 months ago. Last edited by OpalYosutebito 3 months ago. |  |
| Declined by Aydoh8 6 months ago. |  |
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Bonadea 6 months ago.
| |
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Spiderone 6 months ago.
| |
Comment: Disruptively resubmitted multiple times with no changes. No sign of notability. bonadea contributions talk 19:20, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: No sources that show any notability. bonadea contributions talk 10:22, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Type | Private company |
|---|---|
| Industry | Hosting, Telecommunications, IT |
| Founded | Early 2020s |
| Headquarters | (various / stated virtual offices) |
Area served | Worldwide |
| Products | Virtual Private Servers (VPS), Dedicated servers, Web hosting, RDP services |
| Website | anonvm |
AnonVM (operating as AnonVM.wtf) is an internet hosting provider that markets anonymous and offshore hosting services, offering virtual private servers (VPS), dedicated servers, web hosting and Remote Desktop (RDP) services. The provider accepts multiple payment options including cryptocurrencies and advertises privacy-focused features such as minimal KYC and offshore locations.[1]
History and services
[edit]AnonVM launched in the early 2020s as a service targeting customers who require greater operational privacy than mainstream hosts, promoting cryptocurrency payments, offshore jurisdictions, and "DMCA ignored" hosting options. The company's public pages describe a range of products including KVM VPS, dedicated servers, cPanel web hosting and Windows RDP offerings, with technical claims such as LUKS-encrypted NVMe storage and high uptime guarantees.[2][3]
Independent coverage
[edit]Independent hosting review sites and hosting directories have reviewed or listed AnonVM. A detailed review published on HostAdvice covers AnonVM's product lineup, pricing and performance testing and describes it as an option for users requiring "offshore" and anonymous hosting services.[4] Other hosting aggregators and reviewer sites (for example hostings.info and DIEG.info) have published hands-on or user-style reviews and test pages for AnonVM's services.[5][6]
Security researchers and internet-abuse monitors have also referenced AnonVM in the context of "abuse-friendly" or bulletproof hosting ecosystems. A Team Cymru research blog identifying networks, hosting intermediaries and virtual office usage associated with a number of offshore/anonymous hosting operators mentions IP ranges and corporate registration patterns linked in open sources to services advertising anonymous hosting, with AnonVM among the operators flagged in their analysis of virtual-office and shell-company patterns used by some providers.[7] Similarly, investigative reporting about related darknet/payment ecosystems has mentioned "abuse-friendly" hosts including anonvm[.]wtf when discussing services that have been used in illicit ecosystems; these mentions are generally part of broader reporting on cybercriminal markets and payment processors rather than standalone profiles of the company.[8]
Reception and user feedback
[edit]User reviews on consumer platforms such as Trustpilot and specialized hosting forums show mixed feedback. Trustpilot contains reviews and a company listing for anonvm.wtf (user scores vary), while technical forums such as LowEndTalk and subreddits discussing anonymous/offshore hosting contain anecdotal reports from individual users about performance, anonymity features and support responsiveness.[9][10][11]
Controversy and legal context
[edit]Independent sources that study cybercrime infrastructure and payment ecosystems sometimes cite anonymous or "bulletproof" hosts as components of illicit ecosystems; AnonVM is included among a broader set of services mentioned in that context in security reporting and research. These sources discuss broader trends (abuse-friendly hosting, payment rails, virtual office use) rather than formal legal judgments against AnonVM itself; editors and readers should distinguish between being named in investigative reporting about ecosystem trends and proof of wrongdoing by the provider.[12][13]
References
[edit]- ↑ "AnonVM — Anonymous & Offshore Hosting Provider". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "AnonVM — Anonymous & Offshore Hosting Provider". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "cPanel Web Hosting — AnonVM". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "AnonVM Review (2026): Expert Analysis and User Insights". 29 December 2024. Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Expert review of AnonVM.wtf". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "AnonVM Review 2026 — DIEG.info". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Jingle Shells: How Virtual Offices Enable a Facade of Legitimacy". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Canada Fines Cybercrime Friendly Cryptomus $176M". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "AnonVM — Trustpilot reviews". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Looking for feedback on offshore hosting providers — LowEndTalk". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Recommendations for truly anonymous web hosting — r/selfhosted". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Jingle Shells: How Virtual Offices Enable a Facade of Legitimacy". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- ↑ "Canada Fines Cybercrime Friendly Cryptomus $176M — KrebsOnSecurity". Retrieved 2026-01-29.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.