Submission declined on 26 March 2024 by Dan arndt (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Hazchem Technologies
Arson as a gas. Persuaded to believe it is only theory. Infiltration occurs at spontainious moments, perhaps even in contrast to
surroundings. Other times you can visualize its next capable move. Set up for problems and upset to public environment.
you may need to work with/against funcshway. Names like UN, Hazchem, asbestos, take the line of destruction/disaster distraction to the annoyance of evolutive and normal outcomes.
Hacker may use a hoax. Viral persuasion. A bomb threat may bring about fear. Apolion scare.
Vehicle disguise. Smell is the key to this solution . People go missing, go with an unaproachable gravitational default.
Fire is not the bad guy. But is disguised as if to be the cause.
Regime/Hitler gas. Contained/directed pollution. Not only the OCD or bipolar disorder. But treatment(such as water treatment/..)
Surge and accidents are results of this often negative system . Voodoo, dejavu, taboo, tapu. Mentality and physical incapable enemy devolution and constant retardation.
Covid/Chinese gas. Short circuit to electricity disguised as if the actual hazard. Conductor and rumor used by infiltrators/ beings.
Diction follow and conflict, heating up,, and viral pictures.
Mad gas, carbon negative.
Not earthed, ground responding.
Located east in south.
°٪ Decimal percentage.
References
editHazchem
Dangerous goods
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.