| Submission declined on 10 September 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 3 September 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Timtrent 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by SafariScribe 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by SafariScribe 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 February 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 9 months ago.
| |
Comment: The tone is still substantially problematic. There are several seemingly unnecessary cutaways and direct quotes on tangential topics. "[t]he founders were not aware that “community college” was already a well-established concept in for instance the United States, where it stands for something different. This does create some confusion now and then.", is this an interview? Is there WP:COI? Why is this group actually notable? Utopes (talk / cont) 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There is a very great deal wrong with the text and tone. Wikipedia doesn't have any interest in magazine narrative tone, nor in anything akin to drawing a conclusion. "Thus" draws a conclusion, as does "hence" and the quote prior to the latter is not required. "can be traced back". Can it? We do not need possibility, we need facts, please. Same with "the historical context of the views of the ACC was the ever closer and wider " which is narrative, not facts.Rather than my picking every sentence apart please edit this for tone, please remove your own POV, and cute, cut, and cut again 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Be careful of WP:CITEOVERKILL. Remove all primary sources as explained in WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Per WP:ORG, we need to see significant coverage of the organisation in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject.Offline sources must be cited with sufficient details to enable them to be reliably identified for verification purposes; see WP:OFFLINE for advice. (Online sources would be preferred, obviously.) DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Association for Community Colleges (ACC) was a European, nonprofit and non-governmental member organization. The ACC was founded on 11 August 1999 and dissolved 19 December 2021.[1]
The ACC advocated for forming a European transnational public sphere by means of European civic education.[2][3][4][5]
Notes
edit- ^ Still online (2024-06-16) at www.acc.eu.org
- ^ Riis-Søndergaard, Laust (December 2003). "Solformørkelse og oplysning – Association for Community Colleges vil skabe højskoler på europæisk basis". Højskolebladet. 128. årgang (20): 43–44.
- ^ Nikolova, Natalia: Ролята на неформалното образование в обединена Европа. Асоциация за обществени колежи със Седалище Дания. Образование 2004/4, Година XIII, page 84-86
- ^ Mikkelsen, Morten: Grundtvig på europæisk. Kristeligt Dagblad, 21 May, 2005, page 2.
- ^ Lucie Čížková: Learning for European Co-Citizenship – Danish Contribution to the Educational Aspect of Post-National Identity Formation in Europe, Chapter V, page 89-98. Univerzita Karlova – Charles University, Prague, 2003/2004.