Draft:Blue J

Submission declined on 20 April 2026 by Nighfidelity (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

promotional language: see Words to watch;
personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Nighfidelity 4 months ago. Last edited by Nighfidelity 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 9 February 2026 by OrangeWaylon (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by OrangeWaylon 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 4 February 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by ChrysGalley 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 29 January 2026 by Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Hurricane Wind and Fire 6 months ago.

Comment: The notability requirements need improving. The Axios source helps in terms of sourcing a point but it isn't really describing the company nor is it significant coverage. As previously advised, have a good study of WP:NCORP ChrysGalley (talk) 18:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Comment: References 1 and 2 are not independent of the subject, I cannot access Reference 3 because of the paywall (but that doesn't mean the source doesn't establish notability) and I don't think Reference 4 is independent of the subject either because it involves an interview with the CEO. See WP:SIRS. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:48, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Blue J is a Toronto-based technology company that develops artificial intelligence software for tax research.^[1]^[2]^[3] The company operates a generative artificial intelligence platform for use by tax professionals, providing responses to tax research questions that include citations to underlying legal and regulatory sources.^[4]^[5]^[6]

History

Blue J was founded in 2015 by Benjamin Alarie, Brett Janssen, Anthony Niblett, and Albert Yoon, as a supervised machine learning system intended to analyze and predict outcomes in tax law cases.^[7]

In 2023, Blue J relaunched its platform as a generative artificial intelligence tool for tax research, partnering with OpenAI.^[8]

References

↑ Shen, Lucinda. "Tax research startup Blue J swoops up $122M Series D". Axios. Retrieved 4 February 2026.
↑ BrainStation. "LegalTech is Building its Profile in the Professional Community". BrainStation. Retrieved 9 February 2026.
↑ Agrawal, Ajay. "The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction". SSRN. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved 9 February 2026.
↑ Shen, Lucinda. "Tax research startup Blue J swoops up $122M Series D". Axios. Retrieved 4 February 2026.
↑ Dylag, Matthew. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Access to Justice: Predictive Analytics and the Legal Services Market". SSRN. Retrieved 9 February 2026.
↑ Castaldo, Joe. "Toronto's Blue J Legal raises $167-million as demand for its ChatGPT-like chatbot for tax pros takes off". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 9 March 2026.
↑ Nowak, Peter. "Artificial intelligence takes the drudgery out of legal work". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 29 January 2026.
↑ Nuñez, Michael. "How AI tax startup Blue J torched its entire business model for ChatGPT—and became a $300 million company". VentureBeat. Retrieved 29 January 2026.

[1] Shen, Lucinda. "Tax research startup Blue J swoops up $122M Series D". Axios. Retrieved 4 February 2026.

[2] BrainStation. "LegalTech is Building its Profile in the Professional Community". BrainStation. Retrieved 9 February 2026.

[3] Agrawal, Ajay. "The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction". SSRN. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved 9 February 2026.

[4] Shen, Lucinda. "Tax research startup Blue J swoops up $122M Series D". Axios. Retrieved 4 February 2026.

[5] Dylag, Matthew. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Access to Justice: Predictive Analytics and the Legal Services Market". SSRN. Retrieved 9 February 2026.

[Joe-6] Castaldo, Joe. "Toronto's Blue J Legal raises $167-million as demand for its ChatGPT-like chatbot for tax pros takes off". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 9 March 2026.

[The_Globe_and_Mail-7] Nowak, Peter. "Artificial intelligence takes the drudgery out of legal work". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 29 January 2026.

[VentureBeat-8] Nuñez, Michael. "How AI tax startup Blue J torched its entire business model for ChatGPT—and became a $300 million company". VentureBeat. Retrieved 29 January 2026.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]