Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 1 November 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by HitroMilanese 24 days ago. |
Brexiconomics is an emerging field of study focused on analysing and understanding the impact of Brexit on the economic, social, and political landscape of the United Kingdom. It examines how the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union has affected industries, government policies, trade, social dynamics, and international relations. As a multidisciplinary field, Brexiconomics incorporates insights from economics, political science, sociology, and history to create a comprehensive analysis of Brexit’s enduring legacy.
Overview
editBrexiconomics encompasses the study of both short- and long-term consequences of Brexit. It aims to quantify and analyse changes in trade, investment, employment, migration, and economic growth, as well as the social and political ramifications. The field has gained attention due to the complexity of Brexit’s impact on the UK and the challenges involved in forecasting the long-term effects on the country's standing in the global economy.
Background
editThe term "Brexiconomics" was first popularised following the UK's vote to leave the EU in 2016. Initially used informally to describe economic analyses related to Brexit, it has since evolved into a more formal field of study, gaining further traction with the publication of Brexiconomics: Unravelling the Impact of Brexit[1] by Rene C. Mugenzi. Mugenzi’s book played a key role in bringing the term into mainstream discourse, where it is now widely used in academic and policy circles to refer to a structured investigation of Brexit’s multifaceted impact. Researchers, think tanks, and universities continue to expand the body of literature on Brexiconomics, exploring issues from regulatory divergence to shifts in public sentiment.
Areas of Study
editEconomic Impact
editBrexiconomics analyses the economic shifts resulting from Brexit, including trade disruptions, shifts in foreign direct investment (FDI), currency fluctuations, and the effects on the labour market. It examines how tariffs, customs checks, and regulatory changes have influenced business operations, competitiveness, and consumer prices.
Social Impact
editSocial aspects of Brexiconomics focus on the changing demographics and public sentiment in the UK post-Brexit. Topics include migration patterns, societal divisions, and the rise of identity-based politics. Research often highlights the ways in which Brexit has exacerbated regional inequalities and altered public perceptions of national identity.
Political Impact
editThe political dimensions of Brexiconomics include an analysis of shifts in governmental policies, changes in party politics, and the challenges Brexit poses for the union of the UK, particularly in Scotland and Northern Ireland. It also considers the UK's altered role in global governance and its efforts to establish new international partnerships.
Methodology
editBrexiconomics relies on a multidisciplinary approach, combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Economists may use statistical analyses and economic modelling to forecast growth, while sociologists and political scientists employ surveys and case studies to capture public opinion and shifts in political dynamics. Comparative studies with other countries are also common to gauge the UK's relative position.
Criticism and Debate
editAs a relatively new field, Brexiconomics has faced criticism. Some argue that it lacks a distinct methodology, as it draws heavily from pre-existing disciplines. Others note that the impacts of Brexit are still evolving, making definitive conclusions challenging. Proponents, however, argue that Brexiconomics is essential for understanding Brexit’s legacy, providing a necessary framework for future policy-making.
Key Publications
editSome of the foundational works and recent contributions in the field of Brexiconomics include:
- Mugenzi, R. C. (2024). Brexiconomics: Unravelling the Impact of Brexit. An in-depth analysis of Brexit’s effects on the UK's economic and social structure.[2]
- Dhingra, S., Sampson, T. (2019). "Brexit and the UK Economy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 163-184.[3]
- Menon, A., & Evans, G. (2017). Brexit and British Politics. A comprehensive look at the political transformations instigated by Brexit.[4]
See Also
edit- Political Economy of Brexit[5]
- Economic Impact of Brexit
References
edit- ^ Rene C, Mugenzi (2024). BREXICONOMICS: Unraveling The Impact of Brexit (published 6 October 2024). ISBN 979-8340633538.
- ^ Mugenzi, R C (2024). Brexiconomics: Unravelling the Impact of Brexit. ISBN 979-8340633538.
- ^ Dhingra, Swati; Thomas, Sampson (2019). Brexit and the UK Economy," Journal of Economic Perspectives. LSE.
- ^ Evans, G; Menon, A (2017). Brexit and British Politics (11st ed.). Polity. pp. 11 December 2017. ISBN 978-1509523863.
- ^ Bailey, D; Budd, L (2017). Political Economy of Brexit. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781911116653.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.