Submission declined on 21 July 2026 by SomeoneDreaming (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by SomeoneDreaming 35 days ago. Last edited by SomeoneDreaming 35 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Comment: Two sources are manufacturer website (not independent) and user-generated content (not reliable). SomeoneDreaming (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Casio A168

The Casio A168 is a digital watch manufactured by Japanese electronics company Casio. Introduced in 1995 as a variant of the world renowned F-91W. In 2011 it was honored with Japan’s Good Design Long Life Design Award

Specifications

Design

Designed by Casio's Japanese design team, the case of the A168 measures 35 by 30 by 8 millimeters (1.4 by 1.2 by 0.31 inches}. The case is primarily made of stainless steel including the strap, with the manufacturer's module number ,3298, stamped on the case back. The total weight is 49 grams (1.7 ounces).

Water resistance

The front of the watch is marked "Water Resist", the ISO standard meaning of which is: "Suitable for everyday use. Splash/rain resistant. NOT suitable for showering, bathing, swimming, snorkeling, water related work and fishing".

Counterfeits

Counterfeits of this watch are very common, despite its low price. These counterfeits usually have lower-quality stainless steel, louder and higher-pitched beeps, and less accurate timekeeping than genuine models. On newer versions holding the right button for more than 3 seconds in the main timekeeping mode will make the display show "CASIo" as a quick authenticity check. However, some counterfeit models have been designed to mimic this feature. Another way to check is by pressing all three buttons at once to enter test mode. In some fake modules, an extra dot appears on the display, or, if the extra dot is not there, another indication is if the dot is too far from the letters indicating the day of the week.

https://www.casio.com/intl/watches/casio/standard/vintage/a168/

https://www.watchcrunch.com/SaintJayJay/reviews/casio-a168wa-1yes-review-250470