 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,588 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 26 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 26 August 2024 by OnlyNano (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by OnlyNano 16 days ago. | |
Comment: This should be written as an encyclopedia article, not an advertisement. There is no need to have a section about features, applications, "integration with SPM" unless these claims have been vetted and significantly covered by independent, reliable sources, in which case it should be presented in the article neutrally. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
 | |
| Developer(s) | Structural Brain Mapping Group Christian Gaser Robert Dahnke |
|---|---|
| Stable release | 12.9
/ 25 May 2024 |
| Repository | github |
| Written in | Matlab, C |
| Operating system | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Platform | MATLAB, SPM |
| Type | Neuroimaging data analysis |
| License | GNU_General_Public_License |
| Website | neuro-jena |
CAT (Computational Anatomy Toolbox) is a free and open source software package used for the analysis of structural brain imaging data, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)[1]. Developed by Christian Gaser and Robert Dahnke of the Structural Brain Mapping Group at the University of Jena, CAT is an extension of the SPM software.
Functionality
editCAT provides tools for voxel-based morphometry (VBM)[2], cortical thickness[3], folding[4], and gyrification[5] analysis, as well as volume or surface estimates within predefined brain regions of interest.
Related software
editReferences
edit- ^ Gaser C, Dahnke R, Thompson PM, et al. (Aug 2024). "CAT: a computational anatomy toolbox for the analysis of structural MRI data". GigaScience. 13: giae049. doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae049. PMC 11299546. PMID 39102518.
- ^ Ashburner J, Friston KJ (Jun 2000). "Voxel-based morphometry--the methods". NeuroImage. 11 (6): 805–21. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582. PMID 10860804.
- ^ Dahnke R, Yotter RA, Gaser C (Jan 2013). "Cortical thickness and central surface estimation". NeuroImage. 65: 336–48. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.050. PMID 23041529.
- ^ Yotter RA, Nenadic I, Ziegler G, et al. (Jun 2011). "Local cortical surface complexity maps from spherical harmonic reconstructions". NeuroImage. 56 (3): 961–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.007. PMID 21315159.
- ^ Luders E, Thompson PM, Narr KL, et al. (Jul 2009). "A curvature-based approach to estimate local gyrification on the cortical surface". NeuroImage. 29 (4): 1224–30. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.049. PMID 16223589.