Submission declined on 11 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI)
editCritical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) is a scientific challenge designed to evaluate methods for metagenome analysis.
As of 2024 April, 2 CAMI competitions have been held. CAMI in 2015[1] and CAMI2 in 2019-2020[2]
References
edit- ^ Sczyrba, Alexander; et al. (2017). "Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software". Nature Methods. 14 (11): 1063–1071. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4458. PMC 5903868. PMID 28967888.
- ^ Meyer, Fernando; et al. (2022). "Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges". Nature Methods. 19 (4): 429–440. doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01431-4. ISSN 1548-7105. PMC 9007738. PMID 35396482.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.