Submission declined on 6 September 2024 by Cabrils (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 02:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
David Tomasi (born 1981) is an American neuroscientist, clinical psychologist, and researcher. He is the Secretary of the Vermont Academy of Arts and Sciences (VAAS) and teaches at the Vermont State Colleges (VSC) and the Community College of Vermont (CCV). He has studied olfactory virtual reality and the mind-body problem[1]
Education
editTomasi completed his first bachelor's, master's, and clinical internship at the University of Verona (ABAVR), followed by a master's in counseling and neuroscience at the University of Turin (UniPsi), a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Sofia (Софийски университет „Св. Климент Охридски"), a PhD in Psychology from the Universidad Azteca, and a DSc in Medical Sciences from the Russian Academy of Sciences (Российская Академия Естествознания).[2] He was a Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy and Neuroscience from the University of Sofia and completed his training and licensure in clinical psychology in the State of Vermont.
Academic career
editTomasi's research focuses on the intersection between neuroscience, psychology, and philosophy. Among his contribution, the studies on olfactory virtual reality and brain-computer interface have received international recognition. Tomasi taught at the University of Vermont, St. Michael's College, the University of Sofia, the Community College of Vermont (CCV), and worked as an Inpatient Psychiatry Psychotherapist at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC), before being elected as a Secretary of the Vermont Academy of Arts and Sciences (VAAS) in 2018.
Bibliography
edit- Tomasi, D. 2020. Critical Neuroscience and Philosophy. A Scientific Re-examination of the Mind-body Problem. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
- Tomasi, D 2020. Mind-Body Medicine in Inpatient Psychiatry. New York, NY: Ibidem Verlag / Columbia University Press
- Marini, M.G., Tomasi, D. (contr.) 2018. Languages of Care in Narrative Medicine: Words, Space and Time in the Healthcare Ecosystem. New York, NY: Springer
- Tomasi, D. 2016. Medical Philosophy. Philosophical Analysis of Patient Self-Perception in Diagnostics and Therapy. New York, NY: Ibidem Verlag / Columbia University Press
- Tomasi, D. 2024. Psychotherapy: Essence, Experience, and Examination. Foreword to Adler, D. 2024. What we really need – Experiences of a psychoanalyst. New York, NY: Ibidem Verlag / Columbia University Press, Original: Adler, D. 2023. Was wir wirklich brauchen: Erfahrungen eines Psychoanalytiker. Stuttgart, D: Schattauer / Klett-Cotta Verlag
- Goddard, C., 2018. Minimal English for a Global World. Christian, D., Farrelly, N., Maley, W., Marini, M.G., Mooney, A., Peeters, B., Torkki J., Vanhatalo, U., Wesley, M., Wierzbicka A., Tomasi, D. (contr. - Linguistics interface: applying the Natural Semantic Metalanguage to Narrative Medicine). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
References
edit- ^ "Newsweek report on Exercise and Depression". Newsweek. 21 May 2019.
- ^ "Sofiiski Universitet". University of Sofia.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.