Submission declined on 2 June 2024 by Wikishovel (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 27 May 2024 by Liance (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Liance 5 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 25 May 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 5 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 23 May 2024 by Grabup (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Grabup 5 months ago.
| |
Comment: There's no significant coverage of this company online, just blackhat SEO/PR which User:Kuru has kindly cleared out. Creator has now been blocked, so I'll decline rather than reject, and leave this as a honeypot for the inevitable socks to follow. Wikishovel (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please remove spam link Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please read WP:REFB and learn how to reference content and please remove spam links. Theroadislong (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Blogs can't establish notability, it require in-depth coverage from multiple reliable secondary sources to establish notability. GrabUp - Talk 15:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Company type | Industry |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2002 |
| Founder | Michael Latham |
| Headquarters | 4406 SAGE LN MELISSA, TX 75454 |
Key people | Michael Latem, Nick Kaufman, Stefan Russo, Thomas Lieberman |
| Products | Installation of production equipment, Development of mineral deposits |
| Owner | Michael Latham |
Number of employees | 3000 |
| Website | https://delmar.biz/ http://www.delmar.energy/ |
Del Mar Energy is an American oil extraction and power generation company.
History
editThe company was founded in 2002 in Texas. The holding is involved in oil extraction and related resources, construction and maintenance of roads, oil export, and the production of solar panels.[citation needed]
In 2012, Del Mar Energy opened six research centers.[citation needed]
As of 2024, Del Mar Energy exports oil to Turkey through the Strait of Gibraltar.[citation needed] In the same year, the company launched the production of advanced solar panels, which are 20% more efficient than previous models.[citation needed]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.