Submission declined on 15 August 2024 by LR.127 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 14 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Utopes 3 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 13 August 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 August 2024 by Bobby Cohn (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission. Declined by Bobby Cohn 3 months ago. | |
Comment: This page may be better off as part of Janet Echelman's article, not an entirely new article. Some reliable, published sources exist in this draft; if they were brought to merge with the artist's article (and trimmed down to only list the facts), it may be better for Wikipedia. LR.127 (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Janet Echelman is not a reliable secondary source for coverage about "Earthtime", as they made the sculptures. The subject should primarily be significantly described by secondary, reliable sources who are independent of the subject, in order to meet Wikipedia's standalone-notability guidelines.Generally speaking, echelman.com and ted.com should presumably not be used as "references to establish notability". At the moment, it doesn't seem this topic has standalone-notability, outside of the article for Janet Echelman which already exists and this topic can be discussed at if desired. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This is just a list of publishings, failing WP:NOT. Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
American fiber artist Janet Echelman created the "Earthtime" series as a collection of fiber soft sculptures. Echelman's goal is to highlight "the complex interconnections between human beings and our physical world".[1] Depicting how a geological event in one part of the world can create ripples across the entire Pacific Ocean. The designs are drawn from scientific data sets after these natural disasters. [2][3][4][5]
Earthtime 1.8
edit
"Earthtime 1.8" is a large, aerial net sculpture that undulates with the wind and weather. It’s designed for easy transportation and can be installed for exhibitions, tethered to already existing architecture. At night, colored lights are projected onto the sculpture, and viewers can interact with the projected colors using a smartphone app.[6]
The "Earthtime 1.8" design was formed from the scientific data after the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami that originated in Japan in 2011.[7][8]
The "Earthtime 1.8" sculpture has been installed in: London, UK (2016), San Diego, CA (2016), Mexico City, Mexico (2017), Beijing, China (2017), Xian, China (2018), Green Mountain Falls, CO (2019), and Perth, Australia (2021).
Earthtime 1.78
edit
The "Earthtime 1.78" design was formed from the scientific data after the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami that originated in Japan in 2011.
The "Earthtime 1.78" sculpture has been installed in: Madrid, Spain (2018), Dubai, UAE (2018), Beverly Hills, CA (2019), Borås, Sweden (2021), Helsinki, Finland (2021), Vienna, Austria (2021), and Milan, Italy (2022).
Earthtime 1.26
edit"Earthtime 1.26" is a 230-foot (70 m) aerial sculpture first displayed during Denver's Biennial of the Americas in July of 2010. The city commissioned this piece and requested a large but temporary sculpture.[9][10]
The sculpture's title "Earthtime 1.26" refers to the scientific data that shows the period in microseconds that the day was shortened from the Chile earthquake and tsunami that occurred in 2010.[11][12][13]
The "Earthtime 1.26" sculpture has been installed in: Denver, Colorado (2010), Sydney, Australia (2011), Amsterdam, Netherlands (2013), Singapore (2014), Montreal, Canada (2015, 2016, 2017), Prague, Czech Republic (2015), Durham, UK (2015), Santiago, Chile (2016), Shanghai, China (2017), Chiayi, Taiwan (2018), Hong Kong, China (2018), Geneva, Switzerland (2020), Munich, Germany (2021), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (2021), Milan, Italy (2022), and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (2023).
Earthtime 1.8 Renwick
edit.jpg)
"Earthtime 1.8 Renwick" is a net sculpture crafted by Janet Echelman in 2015, commissioned by the Smithsonian American Art Museum. It was created for the reopening of the Renwick Gallery in Washington, D.C. after a two-year renovation and the goal to make a more interactive space.[14]
References
edit- ^ "Janet Echelman: 1.8 Renwick | Smithsonian American Art Museum". americanart.si.edu. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ Echelman, Janet. "Janet Echelman | Speaker | TED". www.ted.com. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ Ramzi, Lilah (2019-04-09). "The Hotel as Patron of the Arts? In Hong Kong, the Peninsula Takes the Trend to the Next Level". Vogue. Retrieved 2024-08-12.
- ^ Brown, Patricia Leigh (2012-09-01). "Janet Echelman's Suspended Sculptures". Architectural Digest. Retrieved 2024-08-12.
- ^ Binkley, Clayton B (2018-07-16). "Structural design and form finding of Janet Echelman's sculptures". Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia. 2018 (5): 1–8.
- ^ "Janet Echelman's 1.8 installation billows above Oxford Circus". Dezeen. 2016-01-14. Retrieved 2024-08-15.
- ^ Smee, Sebastian (2020-01-31). "A hugely popular hit returns to the Renwick". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ "Janet Echelman's 1.8 Renwick". womenshistory.si.edu. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ "1.26 Denver / IPA". www.instituteforpublicart.org. Retrieved 2024-08-15.
- ^ "1.26 in Denver, CO". Public Art Archive. Retrieved 2024-08-15.
- ^ designboom, lea zeitoun I. (2024-01-15). "janet echelman's braided earthtime sculpture in riyadh is a visual echo of tsunami ripples". designboom | architecture & design magazine. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ designboom, kat barandy I. (2021-08-15). "studio echelman weaves flowing and luminous 'earthtime' for mercedes benz in munich". designboom | architecture & design magazine. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ "Janet Echelman completes rippling sculpture in Riyadh informed by earthquake and tsunami data". Archinect. Retrieved 2024-08-14.
- ^ "Inside the High-Tech Makeover of America's Oldest Art Museum Building". Bloomberg.com. 2015-11-09. Retrieved 2024-08-15.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.