Submission declined on 15 April 2024 by 97198 (talk). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Eproctophilia, also known as Fart Fetishism, refers to the sexual arousal stemming from either their own or another person's flatulence. Those with Eproctophilia may find the act, sound, or scent of farting to be sexually arousing. Eproctophilia is categorized as a paraphilia.[1]: 373
The name comes from the Greek words "eproktos," meaning "flatulence," and "philia," meaning "love" or "affection."
See also
edit- Olfactophilia - being sexually aroused by smells.
References
edit- ^ Aggrawal, Anil (2008). "Appendix 1". Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices. CRC Press. p. 373. ISBN 978-1-4200-4308-2.
Further reading
edit- Griffiths, Mark D. (2013). "Eproctophilia in a Young Adult Male". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 42 (8): 1383–1386. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0156-3.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.