 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,074 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 15 November 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 15 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bonadea 10 hours ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2024 by I dream of horses (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by I dream of horses 27 hours ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 November 2024 by Spiderone (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Spiderone 2 days ago.
| |
Comment: Notability has not been demonstrated. Please see WP:GNG and improve the draft accordingly. Hitro talk 16:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Reads like an ad. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
FieldServio is a field service software originally created in 2004 in Huntersville NC. It provides Enterprise software to companies that sell and service industrial equipment. Niche enterprise software is key to small to medium enterprises that need to scale without the resources of a large enterprise. It is a cloud based SAAS business and has employees throughout the United States and Canada.
History
editFieldServio was founded by Jeff Carter in 2004. It has since expanded into Canada. Its original customers were in the Air compressor industry, but it has grown to support several other industries.
References
edit- ^ "FieldServio Software Reviews, Demo & Pricing - 2024".
- ^ https://www.capterra.com/p/157337/FieldServio/
- ^ "FieldServio". payroc.com.
- ^ "FieldServio - Avalara". Avalara, Inc.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.