 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,035 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 12 March 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 January 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Utopes 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by WikiOriginal-9 11 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 20 October 2023 by Timtrent (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Timtrent 12 months ago.
| |
Comment: Advertising/point of view issues have not yet been wholly fixed. Much of the content in this page is not encyclopedic, and unreferenced claims should be removed and condensed. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Not enough significant, independent coverage. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I have removed the small copyright violation and requested its revision deletion.You appear to rely on the org's own website a great deal. This does not help with verification of notability.You appear to have written a brochure, rather than an articleIs this translated from, for example.the German language WIkipedia? If so please use {{translated page}} on the talk page, with parameters filled out correctly 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
| Abbreviation | fkks |
|---|---|
| Formation | 1964 |
| Founded at | Esslingen am Neckar, Germany |
| Type | Registered association |
| Legal status | Charity |
| Purpose | Professional Association Energy Sector |
| Headquarters | Esslingen am Neckar, Germany |
Official languages | German (other main but not official: English) |
1st Chairperson | Bernd Isecke |
2nd Chairperson | Jürgen Barthel |
Managing Director | Hans-Gerhard Köpf |
| Website | www |
Fachverband Kathodischer Korrosionsschutz (German Cathodic Corrosion Protection Association)
editThe Fachverband Kathodischer Korrosionsschutz e.V. (fkks) or German Cathodic Corrosion Protection Association is a German Professional Association for Cathodic Protection specialists, founded and registered in 1964. It is based in Esslingen am Neckar in Germany and is a not-for-profit association. The governance of the association is by the General Assembly, the Executive Board and the Management and represents the interests of cathodic protection specialists.[1][2][3]
Through fkks cert gmbh, a 100% subsidiary of the association, accredited certification schemes in the field of cathodic corrosion protection are provided. The portfolio of fkks cert gmbh includes the certification of qualified persons, or experts as well as of specialised companies.[4][5][6][7]
The association is a registered member of other professional bodies such as DVGW (The German Gas and Water Association), EFC (European Federation of Corrosion). Fkks nominates subject matter experts to DIN (German Standards Institute) to participate in European (CEN) and International Standards (ISO).[8][9]
Honours / Kuhn Medal of Honour®
editSince 1970, the fkks has awarded the Kuhn Medal of Honour®, which it endows to deserving pioneers of cathodic protection for their life's work.[10][11][12]
R. J. Kuhn, helped to bring about the breakthrough of cathodic protection of pipelines around 1928. In 1928. He is is regarded as the founder of the protection potential criterion for CP on buried pipelines, which is still valid today.[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]
In 1958, he received the Frank Newman Speller Award from the AMPP (formerly NACE, National Association of Corrosion Engineers).[20]
| Name | Location | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Robert J. Kuhn | New Orleans, USA | 1970 |
| Heinrich Klas | Neuß, Germany | 1972 |
| Heinrich Steinrath | Aachen, Germany | 1973 |
| Franz Wolf | Hamburg, Germany | 1974 |
| Walter von Baeckmann | Essen, Germany | 1976 |
| Johannes Pohl | Dortmund, Germany | 1978 |
| Peter Pickelmann | Stuttgart, Germany | 1980 |
| Wilhelm Schwenk | Duisburg, Germany | 1982 |
| Gerhard Heim | Hilden, Germany | 1984 |
| Gerhard Reuter | Buchholz, Germany | 1985 |
| Hans Kampermann | Wuppertal, Germany | 1988 |
| Werner Prinz | Essen, Germany | 1991 |
| Franz Schwarzbauer | München, Germany | 1994 |
| Klaus Horras | Wuppertal, Germany | 1997 |
| Alfred Baltes | Bochum, Germany | 1999 |
| Günter Rieger | Bergisch Gladbach, Germany | 1999 |
| Willi Fleig | Stuttgart, Germany | 2003 |
| Wolfgang Vesper | Hattingen, Germany | 2006 |
| Hanns-Georg Schöneich | Neukirchen-Vluyn, Germany | 2014 |
| Bernd Isecke[21] | Karlsruhe, Germany | 2023 |
References
edit- ^ "fkks Fachverband Kathodischer Korrosionsschutz e.V. Satzuung". www.fkks.de. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "DECHEMA-Forschungsinstitut - Stiftung bürgerlichen Rechts". dechema-dfi.de (in German). Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "Weltkorrosionstag am 26. April 2011: Lebensqualität erhöhen, finanzielle Schäden verringern". idw-online.de. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "fkks cert gmbh - Herzlich Willkommen". www.fkks-cert.com. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "EFC Newsletter 2019" (PDF).
- ^ "CEOCORR Commission 2 Report 2011" (PDF).
- ^ "DIN - German Institute for Standardization". din-en. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ "European Federation of Corrosion - List of Member Societies". efcweb.org. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "DVGW e.V.: National". www.dvgw.de. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "fkks Fachverband Kathodischer Korrosionsschutz e.V. Kuhn-Ehrenmedaille". www.fkks.de. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ "Wiley-VCH - Handbuch des Kathodischen Korrosionsschutzes". www.wiley-vch.de. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ a b "DVGW e.V.: Kuhn-Ehrenmedaille". www.dvgw.de. Retrieved 2023-10-20.
- ^ v. Baeckmann, W. (1997-01-01), von Baeckmann, W.; Bohnes, H.; Franke, G.; Funk, D. (eds.), "1 - The History of Corrosion Protection", Handbook of Cathodic Corrosion Protection (Third Edition), Burlington: Gulf Professional Publishing, pp. 1–26, doi:10.1016/b978-088415056-5/50008-3, ISBN 978-0-88415-056-5, retrieved 2023-10-20
- ^ "Electrochemistry Encyclopedia -- Cathodic/anodic corrosion protection". knowledge.electrochem.org. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ Kohn, Robert J. (1933). "Cathodic Protection of Underground Pipe Lines from Soil Corrosion". API Proceedings. 14: 157.
- ^ "The origins of cathodic protection – Protection Cathodique". Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ "Cathodic protection criteria for buried carbon steel structures" (PDF). CEOCOR. 2021.
- ^ "ISO 15589-1:2015". ISO. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ Bash, L. A. (2006-03-12). "R. J. Kuhn's 0.85 V, CSE, Cathodic Protection Criterion for Buried Coated Steel Pipelines is Scientifically Sound". NACE Conference 2006. OnePetro.
- ^ "Frank Newman Speller Award - AMPP". www.ampp.org. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ Mundt, Kathrin (2021-04-06). "Kuhn-Ehrenmedaille für Prof. Dr.-Ing. Bernd Isecke". 3r-rohre.de (in German). Retrieved 2023-11-23.