Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
In May 2024, a significant leak of internal Google documents occurred, providing unprecedented insight into the search engine's ranking factors and algorithmic processes. The leak, consisting of over 2,500 pages of documentation, was first disclosed by Erfan Azimi, CEO of EA Eagle Digital, and subsequently shared with Rand Fishkin, founder of SparkToro.
Contents of the Leak
editThe leaked documents include comprehensive details on over 14,000 API attributes and modules related to Google’s search engine. Key revelations from the documents include:
Click Data and User Signals
editContrary to Google's public statements, the documents reveal that user clicks and other click-related metrics significantly influence search rankings. The NavBoost system, in place since 2005, employs click data to adjust rankings, contradicting Google's previous denials about the impact of clicks on search results.
Site Authority
editThe documents mention a "siteAuthority" score, indicating that Google does measure site-wide authority. This contradicts Google’s earlier claims that it does not use a site authority score in its ranking algorithm (Enterprise Technology News and Analysis).
Authorship and Content Quality
editGoogle tracks author information and uses it to assess content quality. The freshness of content, relevance to the core topic of a website, and alignment between page titles and content are all significant ranking factors. Additionally, Google evaluates the average weighted font size of terms within documents.
Chrome Data
editData from Google Chrome, identified by the "ChromeInTotal" module, is used as a quality signal. This indicates that the pages viewed through Chrome play a role in determining their quality and ranking in search results.
Miscellaneous Factors
editOther notable factors revealed include the importance of link diversity, content originality, and various algorithmic demotions such as anchor mismatch, search engine results page (SERP) dissatisfaction, and exact match domains.
Implications and Reactions
editThe leak has significant implications for SEO practices, exposing previously undisclosed ranking factors and contradicting many of Google's public statements. SEO experts and digital marketers are re-evaluating strategies based on the newfound information. Google has responded by cautioning against making assumptions based on the leaked documents, suggesting that they may lack context or be outdated
This leak, being one of the most substantial in the history of Google's search division, highlights the ongoing tension between transparency and the proprietary nature of search engine operations.
See Also
editReferences
edit- Is Google S.E.O. Gaslighting the Internet? at New Yorker
- Google Algorithm Leak Contradicts What Google Has Said About Website Rankings at CNET
- Google admits massive document leak related to search algorithm is authentic at New York Post
- Google Accidentally Publishes Search Algorithm Documents at Business Insider
- Is Google S.E.O. Gaslighting the Internet? at New Yorker
- Google Leak Spills the Secret Sauce for Search Rankings — Here's What to Know at Entrepreneur
- Internal document leak sheds light on how Google Search works at The National Desk
- Google seemingly leaked a treasure trove of technical search algorithm details at Yahoo