Submission declined on 16 October 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by GraziePrego (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by GraziePrego 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 25 September 2023 by Tagishsimon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Tagishsimon 14 months ago. |
Submission declined on 21 September 2023 by Cabrils (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Cabrils 14 months ago. |
- Comment: I'm not convinced that the refs amount to WP:GNG for this subject. Nor is bullshit like " go-to beach vacation brand" acceptable for a wikipedia article. This article currently seems like PR bordering on SPAM. You need more than minimal PR articles to float a WP biography. Tagishsimon (talk) 20:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROF) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles 'Your First Article', 'Referencing for Beginners' and 'Easier Referencing for Beginners'. Please note that some of the references are not formatted correctly (see Wikipedia's Manual of Style for help). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements (it would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject) then resubmit the page and leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Holden Bierman (born August 11, 2007) is a prominent entrepreneur and the founder and CEO of Coastal Cool, a sustainable beachwear and swimwear company.[1][2][3] Known for his innovative approach to sustainable fashion, Holden established Coastal Cool at the age of 12, positioning the brand as a leader in eco-friendly swimwear.[4][5][3] In 2024, he was awarded the title of Most Influential CEO in North Carolina for Modern Swimwear.[6]
Early Life and Education
editHolden Bierman was born on August 11, 2007 in Holly Springs, NC. He is currently a student at Fuquay-Varina High School.[4][1][2][7]
Career
editHolden founded Coastal Cool in his 6th-grade year with an initial loan of $500 from his parents.[8]The company specializes in beachwear and swimwear crafted from sustainable materials, specifically recycled plastic bottles. Under his direction, Coastal Cool has implemented a business model that emphasizes sustainability and innovation, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers.[3]
Since its inception, Coastal Cool has achieved significant growth, expanding its product line and establishing a strong online presence. Holden’s leadership has been characterized by a commitment to quality, design, and social responsibility. [3]The company actively engages in community initiatives, including ocean cleanups, and collaborates with influencers to raise awareness of sustainable fashion.[2]
Awards and Recognition
editIn recognition of his entrepreneurial achievements and contributions to the fashion industry, Holden was named the Most Influential CEO in North Carolina for Modern Swimwear in 2024[6]. This accolade underscores his impact on the market and his role as a leading figure among young entrepreneurs.[1]
Business Philosophy
editHolden's business philosophy centers on the belief that profitability and social responsibility can coexist. He aims to inspire other young entrepreneurs to pursue their ambitions while making a positive impact on the environment[1][3]. Through his work with Coastal Cool, he emphasizes the importance of innovative practices in the fashion industry and encourages sustainable consumer habits.[2]
Personal Life
editIn addition to his business endeavors, Holden is passionate about mentoring young entrepreneurs and advocating for environmental awareness. He frequently participates in speaking engagements and community events to share his journey and inspire the next generation of leaders.[5][9][10]
References
edit- ^ a b c d WRAL (2024-05-30). "16-year-old CEO starts company selling swimwear made from plastic bottles". WRAL.com. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ a b c d WRAL (2024-05-29). "Fuquay-Varina teen launches swimwear and beachwear clothing line made from plastic bottles". WRAL.com. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ a b c d e Harris, Meggen. "Coastal Cool: How This Gen-Z Founder Created His Brand At 12". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ a b "Wilmington Star-News Subscription Offers, Specials, and Discounts". subscribe.starnewsonline.com. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ a b WRAL (2024-05-30). "16-year-old CEO starts company selling swimwear made from plastic bottles". WRAL.com. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ a b "Coastal Cool (2024 Winner: Most Influential CEO Awards)". CEO Monthly. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ "Teen Entrepreneur: Holden Bierman | God's World News". teen.gwnews.com. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ www.bizjournals.com https://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/inno/stories/news/2023/07/24/fuquay-teenager-turns-500-into-beachwear-business.html. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ "Ocean Innovation Conference". uncw.edu. Retrieved 2024-10-16.
- ^ WECT Staff (2024-09-04). "UNCW conference to focus on ocean-related economic opportunities". www.wect.com. Retrieved 2024-10-16.