 | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by 193.92.72.49 (talk | contribs) 2 days ago. (Update) |
Not to be confused with ethnic aracialism (South-African aracialism).
ethnocultural nonconformity/ ideological statelessness/ ideological aracialism = not necessarily South-African nonracialism
Erudite nonconformists don't usually recognise conformity as default thus they use different terms and not self-disparaging ones (like nonconformity to opposing views).
Canada and the US record races but not ethnocultural nonconformity/ ideological statelessness/ ideological aracialism.
This is wrong because:
- The usage of race/ethnicity/genetics for social compartmentalization is an idea.
Opposing ideas do exist.
- Race is self-reported, not based on statistical genetics.
- Ideological aracialists, ideological stateless and ethnocultural nonconformists do exist and the should be treated equally and recorded when other views are recorded.
- The survey term "other" doesn't suffice for the rejection of the basic survey idea.
The fundamental rejection of ideas should be clearly stated.
Most EU countries don't record race, skipping a social evolution step, thus they didn't evolve a thorough ideology of aracialism like South Africa. Religions, countries and political doctrines are sometimes aracialist, but within their own context which isn't the unbiased acceptance of aracialism itself (even if you're not a South-African, Catholic, Marxist, etc.).