| Submission declined on 31 July 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 5 April 2024 by Jeraxmoira (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Jeraxmoira 6 months ago. | |
Comment: Please remove the WP:REFBOMBING. Articles he has written are not reliable, independent sources, nor do they help to show notability. C F A 💬 17:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Jack Grieve (born 1979) is a Canadian linguist. Since 2017, he has been employed as a Professor of Corpus Linguistics at the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom.[1]. He received his PhD in 2009 in Applied Linguistics under the supervision of Douglas Biber at the Northern Arizona University[1]. Previously, he was employed as a post-doctoral research fellow in Dirk Geeraerts's Quantitative Lexicology and Variational Linguistics research unit at the University of Leuven in Belgium and then as a Lecturer and Senior Lecturer in Forensic Linguistics at the Centre for Forensic Linguistics at Aston University in the United Kingdom[1]. He was also a Turing Fellow at the Alan Turing Institute[1]. In addition to numerous journal articles and book chapters, he has published two books: Regional Variation in Written American English[2][3][4][5] and The Language of Fake News[6]
His main research interest involves studying language variation and change through the computational analysis of large corpora of natural language, known as computational sociolinguistics[7][8]. Much of his research in this area has focused on regional dialect variation in the English language based on large corpora of newspaper articles[2] and social media data[9][10][11], including mapping the use of interjections[12][13] and profanity[14][15][16]. He has also studied the spread of neologisms in American English[17][18][19][20][21][22]. In addition, he has conducted research in the field of authorship analysis, including investigations into the authorship of the Bitcoin white paper[23][24][25], the Bixby Letter[26][27][28], and Donald Trump's social media posts[29][30][31].
References
edit- ^ a b c d "Professor Jack Grieve". University of Birmingham. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ a b Grieve, Jack (2016). Regional Variation in Written American English. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139506137. ISBN 978-1-107-03247-7.
- ^ Smith, Jordan (2019). "Review : Grieve (2016) Regional Variation in Written American English". Corpora. 14 (1): 131–134. doi:10.3366/cor.2019.0164. ISSN 1749-5032.
- ^ Schneier, Joel (2016-11-01). "Dialect Mapping in the Twenty-First Century: Regional Dialect Mapping of Grammatical Variation in a Text-Based Corpus". American Speech. 91 (4): 523–531. doi:10.1215/00031283-3870185. ISSN 0003-1283.
- ^ Zhang, Ying; Lei, Lei (2018). "Dialectology with more sophisticated methods - Jack Grieve, Regional Variation in Written American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. xviii + 335. Hardback $110.00, ISBN: 9781107032477". English Today. 34 (2): 58–60. doi:10.1017/S0266078417000335. ISSN 0266-0784.
- ^ Grieve, Jack; Woodfield, Helena (March 2023). "The Language of Fake News". Elements in Forensic Linguistics. doi:10.1017/9781009349161. ISBN 978-1-009-34916-1.
- ^ "Computational Sociolinguistics | Frontiers Research Topic". www.frontiersin.org. Retrieved 2024-04-05.
- ^ Tatman, Rachael (2017-06-13). "What is computational sociolinguistics? (And who's doing it?)". Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Huang, Yuan; Guo, Diansheng; Kasakoff, Alice; Grieve, Jack (2016-09-01). "Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis". Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 59: 244–255. Bibcode:2016CEUS...59..244H. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.12.003. ISSN 0198-9715.
- ^ Grieve, Jack; Montgomery, Chris; Nini, Andrea; Murakami, Akira; Guo, Diansheng (2019). "Mapping Lexical Dialect Variation in British English Using Twitter". Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 2: 11. doi:10.3389/frai.2019.00011. ISSN 2624-8212. PMC 7861259. PMID 33733100.
- ^ "Twitter is useful for many things—including (unexpectedly) for studying dialects". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Sonnad, Nikhil (2014-09-15). "Um, here's an, uh, map that shows where Americans use "um" vs. "uh"". Quartz. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Erard, Michael (2014-11-18). "Things That Make You Go 'Um'". The Atlantic. ISSN 2151-9463. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Volokh, Eugene (2021-10-23). "Mapping swearing throughout the U.S." Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Gajanan, Mahita (2015-07-17). "Want to know how to curse like a proper American? Have a look at these maps". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ "Which Curse Words Are Popular In Your State? Find Out From These Maps". HuffPost. 2015-07-17. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Grieve, Jack; Nini, Andrea; Guo, Diansheng (2017). "Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online". English Language & Linguistics. 21 (1): 99–127. doi:10.1017/S1360674316000113. ISSN 1360-6743.
- ^ Grieve, Jack; Nini, Andrea; Guo, Diansheng (2018). "Mapping Lexical Innovation on American Social Media". Journal of English Linguistics. 46 (4): 293–319. doi:10.1177/0075424218793191. ISSN 0075-4242.
- ^ Sonnad, Nikhil (2015-07-29). "How brand-new words are spreading across America". Quartz. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ "Linguistic researchers begin hunt for the next 'selfie'". The Telegraph. 2014-03-03. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ "Redefining the Modern Dictionary". TIME. 2016-05-12. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Andrews, Wilson; Katz, Josh (2015-02-22). "Language Quiz: Are You on Fleek?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ "The linguistic verdict: Dorian is probably not Satoshi". www.ft.com. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Vigna, Paul. "Bitcoin Creator 'Satoshi Nakamoto' Unmasked–Again?". WSJ. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Griswold, Alison (2014-04-16). "Another Father of Bitcoin?". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Grieve, Jack; Clarke, Isobelle; Chiang, Emily; Gideon, Hannah; Heini, Annina; Nini, Andrea; Waibel, Emily (2018). "Attributing the Bixby Letter using n-gram tracing". Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 34 (3): 493–512. doi:10.1093/llc/fqy042. ISSN 2055-7671.
- ^ "A Century-Old Abraham Lincoln Mystery May Finally Have an Answer". TIME. 2017-07-19. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Lowe, Josh (2017-07-20). "Abraham Lincoln Bixby Letter 'Was Written By John Hay'". Newsweek. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Zimmer, Ben (2017-12-08). "Have Forensic Linguists Uncovered the Real Author of a Trump Tweet?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2024-04-11.
- ^ Clarke, Isobelle; Grieve, Jack (2019). "Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018". PLOS ONE. 14 (9): e0222062. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1422062C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222062. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6760825. PMID 31553740.
- ^ Stix, Gary. "Two Linguists Use Their Skills to Inspect 21,739 Trump Tweets". Scientific American. Retrieved 2024-04-11.