Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission rejected on 28 February 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Qcne 6 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 27 February 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Theroadislong 6 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 27 February 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Utopes 6 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 26 February 2024 by TheBritinator (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by TheBritinator 6 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 26 February 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago. | ![]() |
Comment: AfC Reviewers: submitting this on behalf of the editing author as the draft has improved since my last rejection. My rejection is therefore undone. Qcne (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I'm rejecting this draft (which means you can not re-submit it) because yet again the language throughout is still wholly unacceptable for a neutral encyclopaedia. Jason may indeed meet our notability criteria, but unless you carefully learn how to write for this encyclopaedia it is pointless to keep submitting this in it's present state and continue to waste our time.If you feel you can write in a dry, neutral, factual manner and have improved the draft, let me know on my user talk page or WP:PING me. Qcne (talk) 11:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: "Through his storytelling, Pine exposes the legacy of late industrialism amidst decay" clearly is NOT neutral encyclopaedic tone! Theroadislong (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Littered with ridiculous, inappropriate unsourced content “Pine’s work eschews the use of ethnographic research for transcendental theory-making” “He immerses readers directly into the environments he studies,” “Pine's work demonstrates a commitment to making scholarly research accessible to a wider audience through careful attention to the art of writing and reading” etc etc etc it will need a complete re-write. Theroadislong (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Picking a line from this piece at random, "Pine opts for a decompositional style, fragmenting narratives and employing free indirect discourse to blur the lines between author, subject, and reader." This is absolutely not neutral, and should be removed, among many of the unreferenced paragraphs. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Marginally improved from last review. Still significantly lacks reliable citation. TheBritinator (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Completely unreferenced. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Submission rejected on 28 February 2024 by Qcne (talk).
This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Category:AfC submissions rejected as unencyclopedic Rejected by Qcne 3 months ago. Last edited by Citation bot 3 seconds ago. |
![]() |
Category:Rejected AfC submissions
Jason Pine
![]() | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (February 2024) |
Jason Pine | |
---|---|
Occupation(s) | Professor of Anthropology and Media Studies |
Employer | State University of New York at Purchase |
Jason Pine is an American writer and professor of Anthropology and Media Studies at the State University of New York at Purchase. Pine's work follows two lines of inquiry: embodied ecologies.[1] and the struggle for personal sovereignty in the face of dispossession.[2]
Education
editPine holds a Ph.D. in Anthropology from the University of Texas at Austin,[citation needed] an M.A. in Anthropology and Historical Studies from The New School for Social Research,[citation needed] and a B.A. in Anthropology from the University of Chicago.[citation needed]
Academic career
editPine has been teaching at SUNY Purchase since 2007, where he is currently Chair of the Department of Media Studies.[citation needed] He has also served as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Missouri-Columbia and the Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II.[citation needed]
Fellowships, grants and awards
editPine has been recognized with several awards, including honorable mentions for the Victor Turner Prize in Ethnographic Writing and the Gregory Bateson Book Prize for [3] The Alchemy of Meth: A Decomposition, and the Premio Sila: Sguardo da Lontano for the Italian translation of The Art of Making Do in Naples.[citation needed] He was a Berlin Prize Fellow at The American Academy in Berlin[4] and a fellow at the Science History Institute.
Publications
editPine is the author of The Alchemy of Meth: A Decomposition[5][6] and The Art of Making Do in Naples,[7] both published by the University of Minnesota Press. The Alchemy of Meth was published in audiobook format by Blackstone Publishing,[8] narrated by Pine, in 2020. The Art of Making Do in Naples was translated into Italian in 2015 as Napoli sotto traccia. Musica neomelodica e marginalità sociale (Donzelli Editori 2015).[9] Pine has also written numerous refereed essays and book chapters on related topics.
Art installations and performance lectures
editPine has presented art installations and given performance lectures at various venues, including the American Academy in Berlin,[10] the Multispecies Salon of the American Anthropological Association,[11] and the Museum of Arts and Design in New York.[12]
Teaching
editPine has taught courses at SUNY Purchase[13] and The New School on topics such as Alternative Economies, Material Cultures, Ethnographic Film, and Environmental Media.
References
edit- ^ "Introduction: Embodied Ecologies". 25 April 2019.
- ^ "Faculty Profile: Jason Pine". SUNY Purchase. Retrieved 2024-05-29.
- ^ "The Alchemy of Meth by Professor Jason Pine Earns Honorable Mentions".
- ^ "Berlin Prize Website".
- ^ "The Alchemy of Meth".
- ^ Garriott, William (2020). "The Alchemy of Meth: A Decomposition by Jason Pine (review)". Anthropological Quarterly. 93 (4): 825–828. doi:10.1353/anq.2020.0067.
- ^ "The Art of Making Do in Naples".
- ^ The Alchemy of Meth: A Decomposition.
- ^ "Napoli sotto traccia".
- ^ "Jason Pine: Methlabs and Late Industrial Alchemy in Rural Missouri". YouTube. 11 April 2016.
- ^ "Alexander, Celeste. "Chemical Species: From the Surreal to the Sublime." Anthropology Now 8, no. 1 (2016): 78–87". JSTOR 26773873.
- ^ "Qualities of "Economic Performance" in Alternative Economies".
- ^ "Jason Pine Purchase College Faculty Profile".
External links
edit- SUNY Purchase Faculty Profile
- LinkedIn Profile
- Performance at The American Academy in Berlin
- Interview on 'To the Best of Our Knowledge'
- Interview in Rorotoko