Submission rejected on 28 August 2024 by S0091 (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by S0091 3 months ago. Last edited by ZebulonMorn 16 seconds ago. |
Submission declined on 28 August 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Dan arndt 3 months ago. |
Submission declined on 28 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 3 months ago. |
- Comment: Fails the requirements of WP:NPOLITICIAN. Dan arndt (talk) 07:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Doesn't meet WP:NPOL. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)