| Submission rejected on 7 October 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Bonadea 22 days ago. Last edited by Bonadea 21 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 28 September 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 31 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 September 2024 by Dr vulpes (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Dr vulpes 40 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 September 2024 by Asilvering (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Asilvering 51 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 August 2024 by Ktkvtsh (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Ktkvtsh 2 months ago. | |
Comment: After multiple declines for lack of coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources, a single primary and non-independent source was added. It's clear that the individual is in fact not notable. bonadea contributions talk 10:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Further resubmission without adhering to the reviewer's comment, may require you seek some pieces of advice. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: It doesn't appear that this person is notable, and I couldn't find independent reviews of the books for WP:NAUTHOR. Since this a biography we can't have unsourced material in the article. I would review this before resubmitting your article Wikipedia:Autobiography. This article was deleted a couple years ago so I would also review the comments from that discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith L. Craig. If you need help or have any questions feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
 | This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. (September 2024) |
Keith L. Craig (born November 29, 1969) is an entertainment executive in the Hollywood film industry.[1] He is known for playing a significant role in the distribution of several high-profile films, including Coco and several films in the Star Wars and Avengers franchise.[2][3]
Biography
editKeith L. Craig is a retired U.S. Army Sergeant Major who served for 32 years. He held various roles, including combat soldier and Intelligence and Logistics Non-Commissioned Officer.[3][4]
After retiring from the military, Craig joined Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures as the Manager of Central Division theatrical sales and distribution.[3][5] In this capacity, he played a significant role in developing distribution strategies for major franchises, including Star Wars and Avengers.[2]
In 2021, Craig co-founded Porter + Craig Film and Media Distribution with industry veteran Jeff Porter.[2][3][5]
References
edit- ^ https://www.digitaljournal.com/entertainment/sgt-major-keith-l-craig-talks-about-his-career-in-the-entertainment-industry/article
- ^ a b c Jack, Fisher (July 26, 2022). "Jeff Porter & Keith L. Craig Form Powerhouse Porter + Craig Film and Media Distribution".
- ^ a b c d Shelby, LaRita (July 6, 2023). "Sgt. Major Keith L. Craig is Hollywood's Commanding Officer & Chief".
- ^ Staff (2010-09-24). "7th Special Troops Battalion welcomes new command sergeant". Military News. Retrieved 2024-09-27.
- ^ a b Flam, Charna (2023-03-15). "Porter+Craig Film and Media to Release 'Lumina' Starring Eric Roberts This Summer". Variety. Retrieved 2024-09-27.