| Submission declined on 23 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 20 September 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bonadea 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 September 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago. | |
Comment: All except one of the unreliable sources have been removed (good!) but the draft is now completely unsourced (since the remaining source from Times of India can't be used). bonadea contributions talk 11:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: In addition, most of the information is unsourced. bonadea contributions talk 18:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: None of the sources meets the criteria for reliable, secondary, independent sources, and the entire draft would need to be rewritten in a neutral tone. bonadea contributions talk 18:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Kishore Rajendran is an Indian art director and production designer working primarily in the Tamil film industry. His responsibilities include overseeing the design and construction of film sets, as well as contributing to the overall visual style of a project. He has worked on several Tamil films and web series.
Early Life and Education
editKishore was born in Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu, and completed his early education at Alpha Plus Matriculation Higher Secondary School and Alpha Wisdom Vidyashram. He pursued a Bachelor of Science degree in Digital Media Design at ICAT Design & Media College and later studied at Birmingham City University in the United Kingdom.
Career
editKishore Rajendran began his career in the Tamil film industry, where he worked on various film and television projects as a production designer and art director. His responsibilities typically include designing sets, overseeing the construction of film environments, and ensuring the visual consistency of a project. Kishore's work can be seen in films such as Agni Siragugal, Nallavan Per Edutha Kettavan, Deja Vu, Meenakshi Sundar, Ashtakarma, Finger Tip 2, and MY3.
Throughout his career, Kishore was mentored by T. Muthuraj, a well-known production designer in the Tamil film industry. Muthuraj’s guidance had a significant impact on Rajendran's professional development, helping him refine his skills in set design and production aesthetics. Under Muthuraj's mentorship, Kishore gained experience in creating visually cohesive and immersive settings for various film genres.
Filmography
edit- Agni Siragugal (2023)
- Nallavan Per Edutha Kettavan[1]
- Deja Vu (2022)
- Meenakshi Sundareshwar
- Ashtakarma(2022)
- Finger Tip 2 (2022)
- MY3 (2023)
- Brother (2024)
References
edit- ^ "Kettavanu per Edutha Nallavan da". The Times of India.
External links
editBBC | Bollywood | How Biggest Film Industry Works ? Youtube
Indian Production Designers , 21st-century Indian designers.