Submission declined on 11 July 2024 by Cabrils (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
- Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that some of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites). Please note that some of the references are not formatted correctly (see Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor and Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). You may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 02:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Mary Pott Hiatt (born Nov. 16th 1920 in Wusih, China, died Nov. 13th 2005 in University Heights, Ohio, USA).[1] was a Professor and Chair of the English Department at Baruch College, City University of New York.[2]
Hiatt pioneered the use of computers in analysing writing styles of both male and female novelists, for which she won the Richard Braddock Award from the Conference of College Composition and Communication in 1979[3]
Research
editHiatt worked extensively on writing styles and wrote a number of works discussing the interrelationship of style and gender, addressing prevalent stereotypes about 19th and 20th century female novelists[4]. Her computer-analysis of 19th century novelists compared 80 000 words randomly taken from works of both female and male novelists and found no significant differences in style [4], hence forming an important part of feminist scholarship.
Selected bibliography
editBooks
edit- Artful Balance: The Parallel Structures of Style (1975)
- The Way Women Write: Sex and Style in Contemporary Prose (1977)
- Style and the Scribbling Women: An Empirical Analysis of Nineteenth-Century American Fiction (1993)
Journal Articles
edit- The Feminine Style: Theory and Fact (1978)
Awards
edit- Richard Braddock Award (1979)
References
edit- ^ "Mary Hiatt Obituary (2005) - San Diego, CA - San Diego Union-Tribune". Legacy.com. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
- ^ "Proquest". www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/domestic-scribblers-style-scribbling-women/docview/1301822183/se-2?accountid=14682. ProQuest 1301822183. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
- ^ admin (2018-06-06). "CCCC Richard Braddock Award". Conference on College Composition and Communication. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
- ^ a b McCandless, Amy Thompson (1994). "The Domestic Scribblers". Mississippi Quarterly. 47 (4): 669. ProQuest 1301822183 – via ProQuest.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.