Draft:Megaproject Psychosis

Submission declined on 9 October 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Chaotic Enby 50 days ago. Last edited by Chaotic Enby 50 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Megaproject Psychosis is a hypothetical concept that examines the psychological and organizational dynamics that emerge during the management of extremely large and complex projects. This concept suggests that the unique pressures and challenges inherent in megaprojects can lead to distinct patterns of behavior among project stakeholders. These behaviors may include over-optimism, denial of risks, and a tendency to escalate commitment to failing strategies.

Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, anchoring, and the planning fallacy, can be significantly enhanced or magnified in this context. These biases influence decision-making processes and can lead to the upward reporting of selective information, where only positive progress is highlighted while potential issues are downplayed or ignored.

Stakeholder influence, communication breakdowns, and organizational culture also play critical roles in the development of Megaproject Psychosis. Different stakeholders can exert pressure on project managers, leading to stress and decision-making that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term success. Communication issues, such as misalignment between teams or departments, can exacerbate the effects, while the organizational culture can either mitigate or amplify the symptoms.

The recognition and “diagnosis” of Megaproject Psychosis involves identifying these behavioral patterns and understanding their impact on project delivery, such as delays, cost overruns, and compromised project outcomes. Mitigation strategies include implementing robust risk management practices, fostering a culture of openness, and ensuring regular and independent audits of project progress.

Megaproject Psychosis is a term coined by Carl Gomersall as part of his Knowledge Management Innovation Management PhD. Megaproject Psychosis forms a part of the Global Index Value Ecosystem (GIVE) a superior alternative to ESG and Sustainability, providing a comprehensive and fair appraisal and assessment of megaprojects. GIVE moves away from the binary of success-failure to a global value scale. A scale that considers all costs and contributions throughout the whole life of the megaproject. GIVE provides a perspective on the multifaceted influence of megaprojects and how these projects have economic and social reach beyond their immediate scope.

References

Carl Gomersall KIM PhD "KIM Linking Systems Thinking". This thesis explores the knowledge and innovation management interplays in megaprojects and redefines the interpretation and understanding of megaprojects. The integration of Knowledge Innovation Management (KIM) principles with systems thinking approaches, a methodology where knowledge management and innovation are linked through a holistic view of systems, merging the interrelationships and dynamics within organisational contexts to enhance performance through strategic knowledge and systems-based thinking.